VS
When evaluating costs, SITU features a management fee (MER) of 0.05%, compared to 0.06% for THU. Performance-wise, SITU has returned 10.22% year-to-date with +$930 M in net flows, whereas THU is at 6.37% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SITU
THU
| AuM | $4,763.65 M | $149.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.05% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.08% | 0.07% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.06% | -0.03% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SITU | -7.36% | -4.89% | +10.22% | +7.70% | +78.70% |
THU | -5.87% | -5.15% | +6.37% | +6.77% | +66.67% | |
| Flows | SITU | +$307 M | +$350 M | +$930 M | +$1,187 M | +$3,029 M |
THU | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$75 M |
SITU vs THU exposure
Countries
SITU
USA
97.35%
THU
Other
100.00%
Sectors
SITU
Technology
47.58%
Finance
12.41%
Healthcare
9.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.53%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
14.96%
THU
Other
100.00%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SITU
NVIDIA Corp.
8.05%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
THU
CA87239X1078
100.62%
Diversification
SITU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.55%
THU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.62%
Characteristics
Compare
SITU
THU
| Provider | Scotia Bank | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.04% | 1.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 11, 2020 | March 22, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about SITU and THU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SITU or THU?
As of November 5, 2026, SITU has returned 10.22% year to date, while THU has returned 6.37%. SITU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SITU or THU?
As of November 5, 2026, SITU manages $4.76 B in assets, while THU manages $149.61 M. SITU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SITU and THU managed?
SITU is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. THU is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SITU or THU?
Year to date, SITU has seen +$929.73 M in net flows, compared with +$1.60 M for THU. SITU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SITU and THU compare?
SITU has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while THU has an expense ratio of 0.07%.
Which ETF is more diversified: SITU or THU?
SITU holds 498 securities, while THU holds 1. On holdings count, SITU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about SITU and THU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.