SLGC
Sun Life MFS Global Core Plus Bond Fund ETF Series

Full SLGC fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, SLGC features a management fee (MER) of 0.43%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, SLGC has returned 1.88% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.06% with -$70 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
SLGC
-0.29%-1.31%-1.88%-2.49%-
ZUT
+1.82%-5.88%+15.06%+8.12%+77.22%
Flows
SLGC
+$0 M+$0 M-$1 M+$2 M-
ZUT
+$28 M+$56 M-$70 M+$3 M+$256 M

SLGC vs ZUT exposure

Countries

SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
82.83%
Bermuda
17.17%

Sectors

SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
82.26%
Energy
9.30%
Industrials
8.44%
As of October 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
AltaGas Ltd.
9.30%
ATCO Ltd.
9.15%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.73%
Capital Power Corp.
8.69%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.44%
Northland Power, Inc.
8.00%
TransAlta Corp.
7.98%
Emera, Inc.
7.97%
Fortis, Inc.
7.90%

Diversification

SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.93%

Characteristics

Compare
SLGC
ZUT
ProviderSun Life Global InvestmentsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.80%2.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 21, 2025January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about SLGC and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: SLGC or ZUT?
As of October 20, 2026, SLGC has returned -1.88% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.06%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SLGC or ZUT?
As of October 20, 2026, SLGC manages $4.22 M in assets, while ZUT manages $854.01 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SLGC and ZUT managed?
SLGC is actively managed by Sun Life Global Investments. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SLGC or ZUT?
Year to date, SLGC has seen -$0.51 M in net flows, compared with -$69.96 M for ZUT. SLGC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SLGC and ZUT compare?
SLGC has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about SLGC and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds