SLVX
Global X Silver Miners Index ETF

Full SLVX fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Global X Silver Miners Index ETF (SLVX) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that SLVX focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Materials, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, SLVX features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Apr 15Apr 22Apr 29May 6May 13

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
SLVX
-----
HEWB
+3.40%+12.19%+15.71%+59.85%+120.40%
Flows
SLVX
-----
HEWB
+$5 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

SLVX vs HEWB exposure

Countries

SLVX
Canada
64.93%
USA
18.07%
Other
17.00%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

SLVX
Materials
84.48%
Other
15.52%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

SLVX
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
23.11%
PAN AMERICAN
12.62%
COEUR MINING INC
7.08%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
5.80%
FRESNILLO PLC
5.49%
HECLA MINING
5.11%
KOREA ZINC
4.68%
US2044481040
4.34%
INDUSTRIAS PENOLES
4.18%
SSR MINING
4.10%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

SLVX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 32 total
76.50%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
SLVX
HEWB
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Global Silver Miners Index NTR - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield-0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 12, 2022January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about SLVX and HEWB

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SLVX or HEWB?
As of May 15, 2026, SLVX manages $3.80 M in assets, while HEWB manages $291.98 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SLVX and HEWB managed?
SLVX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Index NTR - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do SLVX and HEWB emphasize?
SLVX is most exposed to Materials. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
How do the fees of SLVX and HEWB compare?
SLVX has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of SLVX and HEWB?
SLVX's largest holdings include WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP and PAN AMERICAN. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SLVX or HEWB?
SLVX holds 25 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, SLVX is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about SLVX and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds