VS
When evaluating costs, SLVX features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.55% for ZMT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SLVX
ZMT
| AuM | $27.74 M | $72.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.37% | -0.42% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SLVX | -8.22% | +15.27% | - | - | - |
ZMT | -9.24% | -4.79% | +6.88% | +11.19% | +123.78% | |
| Flows | SLVX | +$3 M | +$21 M | - | - | - |
ZMT | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$18 M | +$32 M | +$22 M |
SLVX vs ZMT exposure
Countries
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMT
Canada
53.10%
USA
30.77%
Other
16.13%
Sectors
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMT
Non-Energy Materials
98.16%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMT
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
5.74%
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
3.29%
Amerigo Resources Ltd.
3.24%
Luxfer Holdings Plc
3.11%
Altius Minerals Corp.
3.11%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.08%
Capstone Copper Corp.
3.06%
Ero Copper Corp.
3.05%
ATI, Inc.
3.04%
Teck Resources Limited
2.99%
Diversification
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
33.71%
Characteristics
Compare
SLVX
ZMT
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Silver Miners Index NTR - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Canadian Dollar Hedged Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.19% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 12, 2022 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about SLVX and ZMT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SLVX or ZMT?
As of October 16, 2026, SLVX manages $27.74 M in assets, while ZMT manages $72.06 M. ZMT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SLVX and ZMT managed?
SLVX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Index NTR - CAD benchmark. ZMT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Canadian Dollar Hedged Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of SLVX and ZMT compare?
SLVX has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while ZMT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about SLVX and ZMT
Metal Miners - The Week’s Worst Performing ETF Segment
Metal mining sector plummeted -6.60% due to rate hike fears and broader economic uncertainty, affecting both supply and demand, with iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM) dropping -6.78% for the week.
Posted on 9/25/2023 by ETF Market Canada inGlobal Markets
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.