VS
When evaluating costs, SOLA features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, SOLA has returned 20.31% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 17.12% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SOLA
XIC
| AuM | $9.76 M | $34,706.72 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.00% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SOLA | +36.09% | +35.51% | -20.31% | -53.31% | - |
XIC | +2.46% | +5.81% | +17.12% | +30.26% | +94.53% | |
| Flows | SOLA | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$8 M | - |
XIC | +$1,611 M | +$3,127 M | +$8,627 M | +$9,713 M | +$14,703 M |
SOLA vs XIC exposure
Countries
SOLA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.46%
Sectors
SOLA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.74%
Energy
17.17%
Non-Energy Materials
15.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
17.19%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SOLA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.10%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.52%
Shopify, Inc.
4.12%
Bank of Montreal
3.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.34%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.00%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.98%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.72%
Brookfield Corp.
2.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.17%
Diversification
SOLA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 219 total
37.87%
Characteristics
Compare
SOLA
XIC
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CF Solana-Dollar Settlement Price Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 15, 2025 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about SOLA and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SOLA or XIC?
As of September 3, 2026, SOLA has returned -20.31% year to date, while XIC has returned 17.12%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SOLA or XIC?
As of September 3, 2026, SOLA manages $9.76 M in assets, while XIC manages $34.71 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SOLA and XIC managed?
SOLA is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CF Solana-Dollar Settlement Price Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SOLA or XIC?
Year to date, SOLA has seen +$0.35 M in net flows, compared with +$8,626.58 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SOLA and XIC compare?
SOLA has an expense ratio of 1.00%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about SOLA and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.