SOLX
CI Galaxy Solana ETF

Full SOLX fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, SOLX features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, SOLX has returned 39.72% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 22.01% with -$126 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10-5051015%Jun 17Jun 24Jul 2Jul 9Jul 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
SOLX
+5.65%-15.26%-39.72%--
ZUT
+1.71%+5.71%+22.01%+27.22%+54.59%
Flows
SOLX
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M--
ZUT
-$60 M-$66 M-$126 M-$42 M+$188 M

SOLX vs ZUT exposure

Countries

SOLX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
83.77%
Bermuda
16.23%

Sectors

SOLX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
84.34%
Energy
8.20%
Industrials
7.46%
As of July 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

SOLX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.57%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.77%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.20%
Capital Power Corp.
8.05%
TransAlta Corp.
7.83%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.73%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.46%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.33%
ATCO Ltd.
7.25%
Emera, Inc.
7.16%

Diversification

SOLX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.35%

Characteristics

Compare
SOLX
ZUT
ProviderCIBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkBloomberg Galaxy Solana Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCryptocurrenciesEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.72%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 22, 2025January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about SOLX and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: SOLX or ZUT?
As of July 17, 2026, SOLX has returned -39.72% year to date, while ZUT has returned 22.01%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SOLX or ZUT?
As of July 17, 2026, SOLX manages $0.83 M in assets, while ZUT manages $852.91 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SOLX and ZUT managed?
SOLX is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Solana Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SOLX or ZUT?
Year to date, SOLX has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$125.69 M for ZUT. SOLX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SOLX and ZUT compare?
SOLX has an expense ratio of 1.61%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about SOLX and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds