VS
Mulvihill Enhanced Split Preferred Share ETF - USD (SPFD) and Brompton Split Corp. Class A Share ETF (CLSA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that SPFD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Non-Corporate, Finance, and Sovereign, while CLSA leans towards Finance and Non-Corporate. When evaluating costs, SPFD features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.6% for CLSA. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SPFD
CLSA
| AuM | $0.00 M | - |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.98% | 0.60% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPFD | - | - | - | - | - |
CLSA | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | SPFD | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
CLSA | - | - | - | - | - |
SPFD vs CLSA exposure
Countries
SPFD
Canada
97.64%
CLSA
Canada
99.84%
Sectors
SPFD
Non-Corporate
53.17%
Finance
44.75%
CLSA
Finance
61.97%
Non-Corporate
37.87%
Top 10 Holdings
SPFD
Dividend 15 Split Corp.
17.26%
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
17.06%
Financial 15 Split Corp.
16.53%
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
14.58%
Canadian Life Companies Split Corp.
11.62%
Premium Global Income Split Fund
6.83%
Premium Global Income Split Fund
4.87%
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
4.61%
Global Real Assets Trust
1.07%
Canada, Bills 0% 21oct2026, CAD (182D)
0.79%
CLSA
Life & Banc Split Corp.
16.82%
Brompton Split Banc Corp.
14.99%
Dividend 15 Split Corp.
13.49%
Financial 15 Split Corp.
13.23%
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
11.15%
Brompton Lifeco Split Corp.
10.62%
E Split Corp.
9.18%
Global Dividend Growth Split Corp.
3.36%
Power & Infrastructure Split Corp.
2.73%
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
2.31%
Diversification
SPFD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 17 total
95.22%
CLSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
97.88%
Characteristics
Compare
SPFD
CLSA
| Provider | Mulvihill | Brompton Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2022 | March 14, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about SPFD and CLSA
How do the fees of SPFD and CLSA compare?
SPFD has an expense ratio of 3.98%, while CLSA has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of SPFD and CLSA?
SPFD's largest holdings include Dividend 15 Split Corp., North American Financial 15 Split Corp., and Financial 15 Split Corp.. CLSA's top holdings include Life & Banc Split Corp., Brompton Split Banc Corp., and Dividend 15 Split Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SPFD or CLSA?
SPFD holds 10 securities, while CLSA holds 12. On holdings count, CLSA is the more diversified portfolio.
How are SPFD and CLSA managed?
SPFD is actively managed by Mulvihill. It does not track an index. CLSA is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do SPFD and CLSA emphasize?
SPFD is most exposed to Non-Corporate, Finance, and Sovereign. CLSA is most exposed to Finance and Non-Corporate.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.