VS
Compare Mulvihill Enhanced Split Preferred Share ETF - USD (SPFD) vs Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR) to find the best fit for your portfolio. SPFD provides Non-Corporate, Finance, and Sovereign exposures, while HPR is primarily weighted in Finance, Energy, and Utilities. When evaluating costs, SPFD features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.62% for HPR. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SPFD
HPR
| AuM | $0.00 M | $934.55 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.62% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.98% | 0.65% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPFD | - | - | - | - | - |
HPR | -0.09% | -0.56% | +6.40% | +10.47% | +69.41% | |
| Flows | SPFD | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
HPR | -$0 M | +$3 M | -$21 M | -$25 M | -$386 M |
SPFD vs HPR exposure
Countries
SPFD
Canada
97.64%
HPR
Canada
95.77%
Sectors
SPFD
Non-Corporate
53.17%
Finance
44.75%
HPR
Finance
50.66%
Energy
22.92%
Utilities
12.12%
Telecommunications
10.65%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SPFD
Dividend 15 Split Corp.
17.26%
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
17.06%
Financial 15 Split Corp.
16.53%
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
14.58%
Canadian Life Companies Split Corp.
11.62%
Premium Global Income Split Fund
6.83%
Premium Global Income Split Fund
4.87%
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
4.61%
Global Real Assets Trust
1.07%
Canada, Bills 0% 21oct2026, CAD (182D)
0.79%
HPR
Enbridge, Inc.
3.02%
Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity, Inc.
2.26%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.25%
BCE, Inc.
2.20%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
2.20%
TC Energy Corp.
1.97%
BCE, Inc.
1.95%
Enbridge, Inc.
1.84%
Fortis, Inc.
1.81%
Brookfield Corp.
1.80%
Diversification
SPFD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 17 total
95.22%
HPR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 168 total
21.30%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about SPFD and HPR
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SPFD or HPR?
Year to date, SPFD has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$21.41 M for HPR. SPFD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SPFD and HPR compare?
SPFD has an expense ratio of 3.98%, while HPR has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
What are the top holdings of SPFD and HPR?
SPFD's largest holdings include Dividend 15 Split Corp., North American Financial 15 Split Corp., and Financial 15 Split Corp.. HPR's top holdings include Enbridge, Inc., BCE, Inc., and Brookfield Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SPFD or HPR?
SPFD holds 10 securities, while HPR holds 62. On holdings count, HPR is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SPFD or HPR?
As of October 19, 2026, SPFD manages $0.00 M in assets, while HPR manages $934.55 M. HPR is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SPFD and HPR managed?
SPFD is actively managed by Mulvihill. It does not track an index. HPR is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
What sectors do SPFD and HPR emphasize?
SPFD is most exposed to Non-Corporate, Finance, and Sovereign. HPR is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Utilities.
Recent articles about SPFD and HPR
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.