VS
When evaluating costs, STLT features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, STLT has returned 0.3% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.48% with -$429 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
STLT
HBNK
| AuM | $4.96 M | $803.00 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.15% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | STLT | -12.62% | +1.07% | -0.30% | - | - |
HBNK | +11.27% | +28.71% | +29.48% | +73.16% | - | |
| Flows | STLT | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - |
HBNK | +$4 M | -$179 M | -$429 M | -$680 M | - |
STLT vs HBNK exposure
Countries
STLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
STLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
STLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
STLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
STLT
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.58% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 11, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about STLT and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: STLT or HBNK?
As of June 19, 2026, STLT has returned -0.30% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.48%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: STLT or HBNK?
As of June 19, 2026, STLT manages $4.96 M in assets, while HBNK manages $803.00 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are STLT and HBNK managed?
STLT is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: STLT or HBNK?
Year to date, STLT has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$429.10 M for HBNK. STLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of STLT and HBNK compare?
STLT has an expense ratio of 1.15%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about STLT and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.