VS
When evaluating costs, SVR features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, SVR has returned 20.02% year-to-date with +$110 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 14.11% with -$1,054 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SVR
ZEB
| AuM | $637.86 M | $5,172.80 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.67% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 13, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SVR | +16.49% | +11.74% | +20.02% | +156.60% | +240.27% |
ZEB | +3.65% | +10.86% | +14.11% | +60.36% | +117.51% | |
| Flows | SVR | -$23 M | -$4 M | +$110 M | +$239 M | +$247 M |
ZEB | -$133 M | -$528 M | -$1,054 M | -$1,424 M | -$1,465 M |
SVR vs ZEB exposure
Countries
SVR
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
SVR
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of May 13, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SVR
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%
Diversification
SVR
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SVR
ZEB
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 15, 2009 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about SVR and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SVR or ZEB?
As of May 13, 2026, SVR has returned 20.02% year to date, while ZEB has returned 14.11%. SVR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SVR or ZEB?
As of May 13, 2026, SVR manages $637.86 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.17 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SVR and ZEB managed?
SVR is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SVR or ZEB?
Year to date, SVR has seen +$110.41 M in net flows, compared with -$1,053.72 M for ZEB. SVR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SVR and ZEB compare?
SVR has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about SVR and ZEB
Canadian Silver ETFs Surge 94% as Fed Policy Shift Fuels Rally
Canadian-listed silver ETFs have gained 94% year-to-date, dramatically outperforming gold funds.
Posted on 12/8/2025 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.