VS
When evaluating costs, SVR.C features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, SVR.C has returned 5.38% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 11.19% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SVR.C
XIC
| AuM | $136.25 M | $30,257.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SVR.C | -18.35% | -21.10% | -5.38% | +88.61% | +183.28% |
XIC | +2.09% | +6.97% | +11.19% | +34.35% | +90.68% | |
| Flows | SVR.C | -$5 M | -$5 M | -$5 M | +$29 M | +$32 M |
XIC | +$420 M | +$2,784 M | +$5,677 M | +$7,745 M | +$11,716 M |
SVR.C vs XIC exposure
Countries
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%
Sectors
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%
Diversification
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%
Characteristics
Compare
SVR.C
XIC
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 4, 2011 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about SVR.C and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SVR.C or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, SVR.C has returned -5.38% year to date, while XIC has returned 11.19%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SVR.C or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, SVR.C manages $136.25 M in assets, while XIC manages $30.26 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SVR.C and XIC managed?
SVR.C is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SVR.C or XIC?
Year to date, SVR.C has seen -$5.09 M in net flows, compared with +$5,676.75 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SVR.C and XIC compare?
SVR.C has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about SVR.C and XIC
Fed Rate Cut Fuels Silver Surge
The Fed’s rate cut weakens the dollar, boosting gold and silver as safe-haven assets; silver ETFs surge 3.97%.
Posted on 9/23/2024 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.