VS
When evaluating costs, SVR.C features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, SVR.C has returned 5.38% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 25.29% with -$1,134 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SVR.C
ZEB
| AuM | $136.25 M | $5,581.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SVR.C | -18.35% | -21.10% | -5.38% | +88.61% | +183.28% |
ZEB | +8.46% | +23.65% | +25.29% | +67.84% | +147.83% | |
| Flows | SVR.C | -$5 M | -$5 M | -$5 M | +$29 M | +$32 M |
ZEB | -$103 M | -$237 M | -$1,134 M | -$935 M | -$1,914 M |
SVR.C vs ZEB exposure
Countries
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%
Diversification
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SVR.C
ZEB
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 4, 2011 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about SVR.C and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SVR.C or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, SVR.C has returned -5.38% year to date, while ZEB has returned 25.29%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SVR.C or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, SVR.C manages $136.25 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.58 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SVR.C and ZEB managed?
SVR.C is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SVR.C or ZEB?
Year to date, SVR.C has seen -$5.09 M in net flows, compared with -$1,133.77 M for ZEB. SVR.C has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SVR.C and ZEB compare?
SVR.C has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about SVR.C and ZEB
Fed Rate Cut Fuels Silver Surge
The Fed’s rate cut weakens the dollar, boosting gold and silver as safe-haven assets; silver ETFs surge 3.97%.
Posted on 9/23/2024 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.