When evaluating costs, SVR.C features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, SVR.C has returned 5.38% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.05% with +$560 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SVR.C
ZSP
| AuM | $136.25 M | $23,941.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.22% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SVR.C | -18.35% | -21.10% | -5.38% | +88.61% | +183.28% |
ZSP | +2.61% | +14.55% | +11.05% | +27.54% | +85.01% | |
| Flows | SVR.C | -$5 M | -$5 M | -$5 M | +$29 M | +$32 M |
ZSP | +$67 M | +$273 M | +$560 M | +$1,490 M | +$5,073 M |
SVR.C vs ZSP exposure
Countries
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%
Sectors
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%
Diversification
SVR.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%
Characteristics
Compare
SVR.C
ZSP
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 4, 2011 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about SVR.C and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SVR.C or ZSP?
As of June 12, 2026, SVR.C has returned -5.38% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.05%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SVR.C or ZSP?
As of June 12, 2026, SVR.C manages $136.25 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.94 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SVR.C and ZSP managed?
SVR.C is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SVR.C or ZSP?
Year to date, SVR.C has seen -$5.09 M in net flows, compared with +$559.91 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SVR.C and ZSP compare?
SVR.C has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about SVR.C and ZSP
Fed Rate Cut Fuels Silver Surge
The Fed’s rate cut weakens the dollar, boosting gold and silver as safe-haven assets; silver ETFs surge 3.97%.
Posted on 9/23/2024 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.