VS
When evaluating costs, TCWW features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TCWW
ZUT
| AuM | $2.81 M | $814.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.93% | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TCWW | +0.03% | +9.16% | - | - | - |
ZUT | -6.91% | -5.97% | +12.81% | +18.92% | +48.01% | |
| Flows | TCWW | +$0 M | -$0 M | - | - | - |
ZUT | +$25 M | -$20 M | -$95 M | -$88 M | +$218 M |
TCWW vs ZUT exposure
Countries
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
TCWW
ZUT
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive TC Quant WW 50 Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.93% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 10, 2026 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about TCWW and ZUT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TCWW or ZUT?
As of September 2, 2026, TCWW manages $2.81 M in assets, while ZUT manages $814.36 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TCWW and ZUT managed?
TCWW is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive TC Quant WW 50 Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of TCWW and ZUT compare?
TCWW has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about TCWW and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.