TECH
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF

Full TECH fund page
VS
CIAI
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF

Full CIAI fund page

Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) and CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TECH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while CIAI leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, TECH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.2% for CIAI. Performance-wise, TECH has returned 1.63% year-to-date with -$19 M in net flows, whereas CIAI is at 13.86% with -$144 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.0%Sep 29Oct 6Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TECH
-6.11%+2.41%-1.63%-5.37%+90.59%
CIAI
-14.22%-2.39%+13.86%+4.88%-
Flows
TECH
-$1 M-$44 M-$19 M-$15 M-$27 M
CIAI
-$48 M-$80 M-$144 M-$175 M-

TECH vs CIAI exposure

Countries

TECH
USA
100.00%
CIAI
USA
79.77%
Other
20.23%

Sectors

TECH
Technology
84.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.62%
CIAI
Technology
81.90%
Other
18.10%
As of October 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TECH
Microsoft Corp.
20.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
17.52%
Netflix, Inc.
15.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.
15.62%
Apple, Inc.
15.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
15.46%
CIAI
NVIDIA Corp.
11.77%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
6.94%
Broadcom Inc.
6.50%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.43%
Microsoft Corp.
5.80%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.25%
ASML Holding NV
4.21%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.19%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
3.29%

Diversification

TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
CIAI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 46 total
58.98%

Characteristics

Compare
TECH
CIAI
ProviderEvolve ETFsCI
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkSolactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)-
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.09%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 6, 2021May 2, 2024

Frequently asked questions about TECH and CIAI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TECH or CIAI?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH has returned -1.63% year to date, while CIAI has returned 13.86%. CIAI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TECH or CIAI?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH manages $85.25 M in assets, while CIAI manages $1.00 B. CIAI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TECH and CIAI managed?
TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark. CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TECH and CIAI emphasize?
TECH is most exposed to Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CIAI is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TECH or CIAI?
Year to date, TECH has seen -$19.46 M in net flows, compared with -$143.76 M for CIAI. TECH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TECH and CIAI compare?
TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%.
What are the top holdings of TECH and CIAI?
TECH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Netflix, Inc.. CIAI's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TECH or CIAI?
TECH holds 6 securities, while CIAI holds 46. On holdings count, CIAI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about TECH and CIAI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds