VS
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TECH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while QMVP leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, TECH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.19% for QMVP. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TECH
QMVP
| AuM | $85.25 M | $428.46 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.19% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.62% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.33% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TECH | -6.11% | +2.41% | -1.63% | -5.37% | +90.59% |
QMVP | -8.45% | +1.85% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | TECH | -$1 M | -$44 M | -$19 M | -$15 M | -$27 M |
QMVP | +$38 M | +$79 M | - | - | - |
TECH vs QMVP exposure
Countries
TECH
USA
100.00%
QMVP
USA
99.88%
Sectors
TECH
Technology
84.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.62%
QMVP
Technology
85.55%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.36%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TECH
Microsoft Corp.
20.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
17.52%
Netflix, Inc.
15.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.
15.62%
Apple, Inc.
15.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
15.46%
QMVP
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.36%
Apple, Inc.
6.46%
Microsoft Corp.
6.26%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.16%
Tesla, Inc.
5.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.67%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.48%
Broadcom Inc.
4.97%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.70%
Diversification
TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
QMVP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
58.58%
Characteristics
Compare
TECH
QMVP
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD | Solactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.09% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 6, 2021 | January 20, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about TECH and QMVP
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TECH or QMVP?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH manages $85.25 M in assets, while QMVP manages $428.46 M. QMVP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TECH and QMVP managed?
TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark. QMVP is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do TECH and QMVP emphasize?
TECH is most exposed to Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QMVP is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals.
How do the fees of TECH and QMVP compare?
TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while QMVP has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of TECH and QMVP?
TECH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Netflix, Inc.. QMVP's top holdings include Meta Platforms, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: TECH or QMVP?
TECH holds 6 securities, while QMVP holds 24. On holdings count, QMVP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TECH and QMVP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.