VS
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund (QQQT.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TECH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while QQQT.U leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, TECH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.25% for QQQT.U. Performance-wise, TECH has returned 1.63% year-to-date with -$19 M in net flows, whereas QQQT.U is at 26.05% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TECH
QQQT.U
| AuM | $85.25 M | $10.99 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.62% | 0.46% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.72% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TECH | -6.11% | +2.41% | -1.63% | -5.37% | +90.59% |
QQQT.U | -6.44% | +9.28% | +26.05% | +20.60% | +173.96% | |
| Flows | TECH | -$1 M | -$44 M | -$19 M | -$15 M | -$27 M |
QQQT.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$3 M |
TECH vs QQQT.U exposure
Countries
TECH
USA
100.00%
QQQT.U
USA
95.20%
Sectors
TECH
Technology
84.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.62%
QQQT.U
Technology
95.70%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TECH
Microsoft Corp.
20.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
17.52%
Netflix, Inc.
15.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.
15.62%
Apple, Inc.
15.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
15.46%
QQQT.U
Apple, Inc.
9.90%
NVIDIA Corp.
9.69%
Microsoft Corp.
9.55%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
8.74%
Broadcom Inc.
8.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.27%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.87%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.55%
Intel Corp.
3.40%
Diversification
TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
QQQT.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
70.99%
Characteristics
Compare
TECH
QQQT.U
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD | Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.09% | 0.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 6, 2021 | July 11, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TECH and QQQT.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TECH or QQQT.U?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH has returned -1.63% year to date, while QQQT.U has returned 26.05%. QQQT.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TECH or QQQT.U?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH manages $85.25 M in assets, while QQQT.U manages $10.99 M. TECH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TECH and QQQT.U managed?
TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark. QQQT.U is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do TECH and QQQT.U emphasize?
TECH is most exposed to Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QQQT.U is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TECH or QQQT.U?
Year to date, TECH has seen -$19.46 M in net flows, compared with +$1.69 M for QQQT.U. QQQT.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TECH and QQQT.U compare?
TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while QQQT.U has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What are the top holdings of TECH and QQQT.U?
TECH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Netflix, Inc.. QQQT.U's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: TECH or QQQT.U?
TECH holds 6 securities, while QQQT.U holds 46. On holdings count, QQQT.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TECH and QQQT.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.