VS
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TECH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while TEC.U leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. When evaluating costs, TECH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for TEC.U. Performance-wise, TECH has returned 1.63% year-to-date with -$19 M in net flows, whereas TEC.U is at 10.26% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TECH
TEC.U
| AuM | $85.25 M | $35.70 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.62% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TECH | -6.11% | +2.41% | -1.63% | -5.37% | +90.59% |
TEC.U | -6.44% | +1.87% | +10.26% | +7.37% | +112.02% | |
| Flows | TECH | -$1 M | -$44 M | -$19 M | -$15 M | -$27 M |
TEC.U | +$0 M | +$6 M | +$7 M | +$9 M | +$21 M |
TECH vs TEC.U exposure
Countries
TECH
USA
100.00%
TEC.U
USA
89.19%
Other
10.81%
Sectors
TECH
Technology
84.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.62%
TEC.U
Technology
82.59%
Other
17.41%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TECH
Microsoft Corp.
20.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
17.52%
Netflix, Inc.
15.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.
15.62%
Apple, Inc.
15.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
15.46%
TEC.U
NVIDIA Corp.
12.82%
Apple, Inc.
11.48%
Microsoft Corp.
9.06%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.77%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.85%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.95%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.84%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.90%
Tesla, Inc.
2.62%
Diversification
TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
TEC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 227 total
61.47%
Characteristics
Compare
TECH
TEC.U
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD | Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.09% | 0.04% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 6, 2021 | February 24, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about TECH and TEC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TECH or TEC.U?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH has returned -1.63% year to date, while TEC.U has returned 10.26%. TEC.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TECH or TEC.U?
As of October 29, 2026, TECH manages $85.25 M in assets, while TEC.U manages $35.70 M. TECH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TECH and TEC.U managed?
TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark. TEC.U is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do TECH and TEC.U emphasize?
TECH is most exposed to Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. TEC.U is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TECH or TEC.U?
Year to date, TECH has seen -$19.46 M in net flows, compared with +$6.55 M for TEC.U. TEC.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TECH and TEC.U compare?
TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while TEC.U has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of TECH and TEC.U?
TECH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Netflix, Inc.. TEC.U's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: TECH or TEC.U?
TECH holds 6 securities, while TEC.U holds 226. On holdings count, TEC.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TECH and TEC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




