VS
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TECH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Communication Services, Information Technology, and Consumer Discretionary, while ZWT leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, TECH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.65% for ZWT. Performance-wise, TECH has returned 3.66% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas ZWT is at 10.12% with +$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TECH
ZWT
| AuM | $128.46 M | $237.59 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.62% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 7, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TECH | +12.31% | +8.61% | +3.66% | +28.38% | +133.25% |
ZWT | +15.34% | +14.14% | +10.12% | +45.94% | +159.03% | |
| Flows | TECH | +$18 M | +$32 M | +$20 M | +$23 M | +$9 M |
ZWT | +$6 M | +$28 M | +$28 M | +$32 M | +$71 M |
TECH vs ZWT exposure
Countries
TECH
USA
100.00%
ZWT
USA
97.85%
Sectors
TECH
Communication Services
51.98%
Information Technology
32.27%
Consumer Discretionary
15.75%
ZWT
Information Technology
67.17%
Communication Services
20.90%
Consumer Discretionary
9.29%
As of May 7, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TECH
NETFLIX
19.76%
APPLE
17.82%
META PLATFORMS
16.54%
AMAZON.COM INC
15.75%
ALPHABET INC-CL
15.68%
MICROSOFT-T
14.45%
ZWT
APPLE
9.40%
AMAZON.COM INC
9.29%
MICROSOFT-T
9.23%
NVIDIA
9.04%
ALPHABET INC-CL
9.03%
BROADCOM LIMITED
8.83%
META PLATFORMS
8.66%
NETFLIX
3.21%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
3.04%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES
2.38%
Diversification
TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
ZWT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
72.11%
Characteristics
Compare
TECH
ZWT
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.08% | 4.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 6, 2021 | January 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about TECH and ZWT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TECH or ZWT?
As of May 7, 2026, TECH has returned 3.66% year to date, while ZWT has returned 10.12%. ZWT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TECH or ZWT?
As of May 7, 2026, TECH manages $128.46 M in assets, while ZWT manages $237.59 M. ZWT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TECH and ZWT managed?
TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark. ZWT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TECH and ZWT emphasize?
TECH is most exposed to Communication Services, Information Technology, and Consumer Discretionary. ZWT is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TECH or ZWT?
Year to date, TECH has seen +$19.88 M in net flows, compared with +$28.36 M for ZWT. ZWT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TECH and ZWT compare?
TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while ZWT has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of TECH and ZWT?
TECH's largest holdings include NETFLIX, APPLE, and META PLATFORMS. ZWT's top holdings include APPLE, AMAZON.COM INC, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: TECH or ZWT?
TECH holds 6 securities, while ZWT holds 29. On holdings count, ZWT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TECH and ZWT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.