VS
TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED) and BMO MSCI World ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TGED focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while ESGG leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, TGED features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.25% for ESGG. Performance-wise, TGED has returned 8.25% year-to-date with +$267 M in net flows, whereas ESGG is at 13.59% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TGED
ESGG
| AuM | $1,678.62 M | $58.40 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TGED | -6.57% | -6.32% | +8.25% | +3.85% | +72.18% |
ESGG | -3.59% | -1.57% | +13.59% | +12.52% | +76.66% | |
| Flows | TGED | +$11 M | +$6 M | +$267 M | +$313 M | +$1,053 M |
ESGG | -$3 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$9 M |
TGED vs ESGG exposure
Countries
TGED
USA
66.24%
Japan
7.95%
Other
25.81%
ESGG
USA
70.76%
Other
29.24%
Sectors
TGED
Technology
37.53%
Finance
18.71%
Healthcare
14.33%
Industrials
10.94%
Other
18.49%
ESGG
Technology
39.82%
Finance
16.99%
Healthcare
10.16%
Industrials
8.96%
Other
24.07%
As of November 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TGED
NVIDIA Corp.
6.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.43%
Microsoft Corp.
3.20%
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.90%
Natera, Inc.
2.83%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.74%
HF Sinclair Corp.
2.73%
Unipol Assicurazioni SpA
2.61%
Apple, Inc.
2.59%
Imperial Oil Ltd.
2.50%
ESGG
CA05600C1068
73.36%
CA05600J1012
23.21%
CA05587Y1051
3.43%
Diversification
TGED
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 55 total
33.37%
ESGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 627 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
TGED
ESGG
| Provider | TD Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.15% | 0.86% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | May 9, 2019 | January 27, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about TGED and ESGG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TGED or ESGG?
As of November 9, 2026, TGED has returned 8.25% year to date, while ESGG has returned 13.59%. ESGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TGED or ESGG?
As of November 9, 2026, TGED manages $1.68 B in assets, while ESGG manages $58.40 M. TGED is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TGED and ESGG managed?
TGED is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. ESGG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: TGED or ESGG?
TGED holds 55 securities, while ESGG holds 1. On holdings count, TGED is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TGED or ESGG?
Year to date, TGED has seen +$267.46 M in net flows, compared with +$0.02 M for ESGG. TGED has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TGED and ESGG compare?
TGED has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ESGG has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What sectors do TGED and ESGG emphasize?
TGED is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ESGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.