VS
Compare TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF) vs iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TINF provides Utilities, Industrials, and Energy exposures, while CIF is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, TINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for CIF. Performance-wise, TINF has returned 7.13% year-to-date with +$184 M in net flows, whereas CIF is at 19.69% with +$419 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TINF
CIF
| AuM | $460.91 M | $1,540.17 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TINF | -3.09% | -3.94% | +7.13% | +7.17% | +55.58% |
CIF | -1.12% | -3.57% | +19.69% | +22.91% | +101.71% | |
| Flows | TINF | +$23 M | +$68 M | +$184 M | +$239 M | +$301 M |
CIF | +$6 M | +$100 M | +$419 M | +$524 M | +$780 M |
TINF vs CIF exposure
Countries
TINF
USA
36.21%
Spain
14.01%
Canada
8.97%
Other
40.81%
CIF
USA
40.12%
Canada
34.69%
Brazil
7.87%
Other
17.32%
Sectors
TINF
Utilities
43.27%
Industrials
33.67%
Energy
22.64%
CIF
Utilities
44.52%
Energy
26.50%
Industrials
25.50%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TINF
Aena S.M.E. SA
6.13%
Iberdrola SA
5.63%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.30%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
4.56%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.29%
The Southern Co.
3.84%
TC Energy Corp.
3.51%
Enel SpA
3.48%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
3.09%
National Grid Plc
2.94%
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.37%
Edison International
5.33%
Enel Chile SA
4.25%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.11%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.86%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.66%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.56%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.35%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.23%
Keyera Corp.
3.12%
Diversification
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 49 total
42.78%
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
39.85%
Characteristics
Compare
TINF
CIF
| Provider | TD Asset Management | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.06% | 1.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | August 27, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about TINF and CIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TINF or CIF?
As of September 11, 2026, TINF has returned 7.13% year to date, while CIF has returned 19.69%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TINF or CIF?
As of September 11, 2026, TINF manages $460.91 M in assets, while CIF manages $1.54 B. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TINF and CIF managed?
TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do TINF and CIF emphasize?
TINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TINF or CIF?
Year to date, TINF has seen +$183.67 M in net flows, compared with +$419.33 M for CIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TINF and CIF compare?
TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of TINF and CIF?
TINF's largest holdings include Aena S.M.E. SA, Iberdrola SA, and NextEra Energy, Inc.. CIF's top holdings include ATCO Ltd., Edison International, and Enel Chile SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: TINF or CIF?
TINF holds 49 securities, while CIF holds 60. On holdings count, CIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TINF and CIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.