VS
Compare TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF) vs iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TINF and CIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, TINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for CIF. Performance-wise, TINF has returned 11.53% year-to-date with +$116 M in net flows, whereas CIF is at 24.13% with +$323 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TINF
CIF
| AuM | $415.36 M | $1,512.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TINF | +0.85% | +3.04% | +11.53% | +16.25% | +60.95% |
CIF | -0.50% | +10.76% | +24.13% | +40.81% | +115.31% | |
| Flows | TINF | +$21 M | +$68 M | +$116 M | +$208 M | +$239 M |
CIF | +$117 M | +$208 M | +$323 M | +$536 M | +$678 M |
TINF vs CIF exposure
Countries
TINF
USA
43.82%
Other
15.38%
Canada
7.47%
Other
33.33%
CIF
USA
58.47%
Canada
32.53%
Other
9.00%
Sectors
TINF
Utilities
34.20%
Other
22.22%
Industrials
22.14%
Energy
21.44%
CIF
Utilities
32.71%
Other
26.76%
Industrials
24.27%
Energy
16.26%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TINF
AENA SME
5.53%
NEXTERA ENERGY
5.47%
WILLIAMS
4.49%
ENBRIDGE
4.09%
SOUTHERN
3.75%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.38%
US4005061019
3.23%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
3.22%
FLUGHAFEN ZUERICH AG KLOTEN COMMON SHARES
3.14%
CIF
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
5.55%
ATCO
4.71%
US29278D1054
4.25%
US20441A1025
4.21%
CATERPILLAR
4.16%
TARGA RESOURCS
4.03%
SCORPIO TANKERS
3.66%
EDISON INTERNATIONAL
3.35%
STANTEC
3.27%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
3.19%
Diversification
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
39.80%
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
40.39%
Characteristics
Compare
TINF
CIF
| Provider | TD Asset Management | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.96% | 1.78% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | August 27, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about TINF and CIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TINF or CIF?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF has returned 11.53% year to date, while CIF has returned 24.13%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TINF or CIF?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF manages $415.36 M in assets, while CIF manages $1.51 B. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TINF and CIF managed?
TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do TINF and CIF emphasize?
TINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TINF or CIF?
Year to date, TINF has seen +$116.10 M in net flows, compared with +$322.96 M for CIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TINF and CIF compare?
TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of TINF and CIF?
TINF's largest holdings include AENA SME and NEXTERA ENERGY. CIF's top holdings include STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC and ATCO.
Which ETF is more diversified: TINF or CIF?
TINF holds 38 securities, while CIF holds 45. On holdings count, CIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TINF and CIF
3 Canadian ETFs that Beat Inflation in 2022
These ETFs managed to stay in the green despite soaring inflation this year.
Posted on 1/3/2023 by Tony Dong inInflation
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.