TINF
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF

Full TINF fund page
VS
CINF
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF

Full CINF fund page

TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool ETF (CINF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TINF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Industrials, and Energy, while CINF leans towards Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, TINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.7% for CINF. Performance-wise, TINF has returned 11.53% year-to-date with +$116 M in net flows, whereas CINF is at 16.46% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TINF
+0.85%+3.04%+11.53%+16.25%+60.95%
CINF
+0.27%+5.60%+16.46%+21.58%+60.34%
Flows
TINF
+$21 M+$68 M+$116 M+$208 M+$239 M
CINF
+$3 M+$3 M+$7 M+$32 M+$41 M

TINF vs CINF exposure

Countries

TINF
USA
43.82%
Other
15.38%
Canada
7.47%
Other
33.33%
CINF
USA
39.97%
Canada
10.80%
Other
49.23%

Sectors

TINF
Utilities
34.20%
Other
22.22%
Industrials
22.14%
Energy
21.44%
CINF
Utilities
37.16%
Industrials
19.30%
Other
17.33%
Energy
12.94%
Real Estate
10.13%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TINF
AENA SME
5.53%
NEXTERA ENERGY
5.47%
WILLIAMS
4.49%
ENBRIDGE
4.09%
SOUTHERN
3.75%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.38%
US4005061019
3.23%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
3.22%
FLUGHAFEN ZUERICH AG KLOTEN COMMON SHARES
3.14%
CINF
EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT
4.58%
NL0015001FS8
4.48%
RWE ST
4.20%
CA13646K1084
3.85%
ENTERGY
3.60%
TARGA RESOURCS
3.52%
CSX
3.50%
CENTRICA
3.40%
WILLIAMS
3.27%
SACYR SA
3.15%

Diversification

TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
39.80%
CINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 42 total
37.54%

Characteristics

Compare
TINF
CINF
ProviderTD Asset ManagementCI
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.96%2.43%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 2, 2020May 12, 2020

Frequently asked questions about TINF and CINF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TINF or CINF?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF has returned 11.53% year to date, while CINF has returned 16.46%. CINF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TINF or CINF?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF manages $415.36 M in assets, while CINF manages $456.27 M. CINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TINF and CINF managed?
TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TINF and CINF emphasize?
TINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. CINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TINF or CINF?
Year to date, TINF has seen +$116.10 M in net flows, compared with +$6.72 M for CINF. TINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TINF and CINF compare?
TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%.
What are the top holdings of TINF and CINF?
TINF's largest holdings include AENA SME and NEXTERA ENERGY. CINF's top holdings include EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT and RWE ST.
Which ETF is more diversified: TINF or CINF?
TINF holds 38 securities, while CINF holds 37. On holdings count, TINF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about TINF and CINF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds