VS
When evaluating costs, TINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.45% for QIF. Performance-wise, TINF has returned 11.53% year-to-date with +$116 M in net flows, whereas QIF is at 12.58% with -$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TINF
QIF
| AuM | $415.36 M | $145.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TINF | +0.85% | +3.04% | +11.53% | +16.25% | +60.95% |
QIF | -0.75% | +3.33% | +12.58% | +20.68% | +58.26% | |
| Flows | TINF | +$21 M | +$68 M | +$116 M | +$208 M | +$239 M |
QIF | -$0 M | -$4 M | -$11 M | -$53 M | -$161 M |
TINF vs QIF exposure
Countries
TINF
USA
43.82%
Other
15.38%
Canada
7.47%
Other
33.33%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
TINF
Utilities
34.20%
Other
22.22%
Industrials
22.14%
Energy
21.44%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TINF
AENA SME
5.53%
NEXTERA ENERGY
5.47%
WILLIAMS
4.49%
ENBRIDGE
4.09%
SOUTHERN
3.75%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.38%
US4005061019
3.23%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
3.22%
FLUGHAFEN ZUERICH AG KLOTEN COMMON SHARES
3.14%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
39.80%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
TINF
QIF
| Provider | TD Asset Management | AGF |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.96% | 3.88% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | February 12, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about TINF and QIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TINF or QIF?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF has returned 11.53% year to date, while QIF has returned 12.58%. QIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TINF or QIF?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF manages $415.36 M in assets, while QIF manages $145.28 M. TINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TINF and QIF managed?
TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. QIF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TINF or QIF?
Year to date, TINF has seen +$116.10 M in net flows, compared with -$11.03 M for QIF. TINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TINF and QIF compare?
TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while QIF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Recent articles about TINF and QIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.