VS
Compare Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) vs Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF (HTA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TLF provides Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while HTA is primarily weighted in Technology and Sovereign. When evaluating costs, TLF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.85% for HTA. Performance-wise, TLF has returned 22.7% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas HTA is at 24.18% with +$54 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF
HTA
| AuM | $156.18 M | $887.22 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF | -4.38% | -5.23% | +22.70% | +29.85% | +95.71% |
HTA | -2.05% | +1.86% | +24.18% | +27.65% | +93.74% | |
| Flows | TLF | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
HTA | +$8 M | +$22 M | +$54 M | +$55 M | +$140 M |
TLF vs HTA exposure
Countries
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
HTA
USA
94.15%
Sectors
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
HTA
Technology
98.93%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
HTA
Microsoft Corp.
5.91%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.44%
Oracle Corp.
5.37%
Intuit, Inc.
5.29%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
5.16%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.08%
Amphenol Corp.
5.07%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.97%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.96%
Diversification
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
52.83%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF
HTA
| Provider | Brompton Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.86% | 8.27% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 20, 2011 | April 27, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF and HTA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF or HTA?
As of September 16, 2026, TLF has returned 22.70% year to date, while HTA has returned 24.18%. HTA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF or HTA?
As of September 16, 2026, TLF manages $156.18 M in assets, while HTA manages $887.22 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF and HTA managed?
TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF and HTA emphasize?
TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. HTA is most exposed to Technology and Sovereign.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF or HTA?
Year to date, TLF has seen +$3.85 M in net flows, compared with +$54.39 M for HTA. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF and HTA compare?
TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of TLF and HTA?
TLF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. HTA's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF or HTA?
TLF holds 26 securities, while HTA holds 25. On holdings count, TLF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF and HTA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.