VS
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund (QQQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TLF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while QQQT leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, TLF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.25% for QQQT. Performance-wise, TLF has returned 22.64% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas QQQT is at 24.13% with +$21 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF
QQQT
| AuM | $156.10 M | $151.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.46% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF | -3.95% | -7.39% | +22.64% | +29.83% | +92.70% |
QQQT | -2.78% | -4.19% | +24.13% | +31.07% | +148.15% | |
| Flows | TLF | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
QQQT | +$1 M | +$7 M | +$21 M | +$41 M | +$95 M |
TLF vs QQQT exposure
Countries
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
QQQT
USA
95.14%
Sectors
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
QQQT
Technology
96.17%
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
QQQT
Microsoft Corp.
11.46%
Apple, Inc.
10.92%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.27%
Broadcom Inc.
9.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.29%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.33%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.99%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.51%
Intel Corp.
2.47%
Diversification
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
QQQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
71.61%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF
QQQT
| Provider | Brompton Group | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.86% | 0.24% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 20, 2011 | July 11, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF and QQQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF or QQQT?
As of September 14, 2026, TLF has returned 22.64% year to date, while QQQT has returned 24.13%. QQQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF or QQQT?
As of September 14, 2026, TLF manages $156.10 M in assets, while QQQT manages $151.78 M. TLF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF and QQQT managed?
TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. QQQT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do TLF and QQQT emphasize?
TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QQQT is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF or QQQT?
Year to date, TLF has seen +$3.85 M in net flows, compared with +$21.29 M for QQQT. QQQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF and QQQT compare?
TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while QQQT has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What are the top holdings of TLF and QQQT?
TLF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. QQQT's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF or QQQT?
TLF holds 26 securities, while QQQT holds 46. On holdings count, QQQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF and QQQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.