VS
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (QQQY) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TLF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while QQQY leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, TLF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 2% for QQQY. Performance-wise, TLF has returned 25.29% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas QQQY is at 17.56% with +$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF
QQQY
| AuM | $159.48 M | $130.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 2.00% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.74% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF | -2.35% | -3.17% | +25.29% | +32.59% | +99.85% |
QQQY | -0.57% | +1.16% | +17.56% | +22.85% | - | |
| Flows | TLF | -$1 M | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
QQQY | -$5 M | +$5 M | +$15 M | +$20 M | - |
TLF vs QQQY exposure
Countries
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
QQQY
USA
94.06%
Sectors
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
QQQY
Technology
95.07%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
QQQY
Microsoft Corp.
11.32%
Apple, Inc.
10.78%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.15%
Broadcom Inc.
9.17%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.27%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.94%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Intel Corp.
2.44%
Diversification
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
QQQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
70.81%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF
QQQY
| Provider | Brompton Group | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.74% | 10.87% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 20, 2011 | October 13, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF and QQQY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF or QQQY?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF has returned 25.29% year to date, while QQQY has returned 17.56%. TLF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF or QQQY?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF manages $159.48 M in assets, while QQQY manages $130.31 M. TLF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF and QQQY managed?
TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. QQQY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF and QQQY emphasize?
TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QQQY is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF or QQQY?
Year to date, TLF has seen +$3.85 M in net flows, compared with +$15.00 M for QQQY. QQQY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF and QQQY compare?
TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while QQQY has an expense ratio of 0.74%.
What are the top holdings of TLF and QQQY?
TLF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. QQQY's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF or QQQY?
TLF holds 26 securities, while QQQY holds 47. On holdings count, QQQY is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF and QQQY
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.