VS
Compare Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) vs BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TLF provides Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ZWT is primarily weighted in Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, TLF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.65% for ZWT. Performance-wise, TLF has returned 22.7% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas ZWT is at 18.53% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF
ZWT
| AuM | $156.18 M | $213.23 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF | -4.38% | -5.23% | +22.70% | +29.85% | +95.71% |
ZWT | +1.29% | +2.32% | +18.53% | +23.32% | +131.01% | |
| Flows | TLF | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
ZWT | -$0 M | +$3 M | -$8 M | -$2 M | +$31 M |
TLF vs ZWT exposure
Countries
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
ZWT
USA
99.05%
Sectors
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
ZWT
Technology
89.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.94%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
ZWT
Apple, Inc.
9.60%
Microsoft Corp.
9.39%
Broadcom Inc.
8.13%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.94%
Alphabet, Inc.
7.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.19%
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.39%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.78%
Diversification
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
ZWT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
71.33%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF
ZWT
| Provider | Brompton Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.86% | 4.93% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 20, 2011 | January 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF and ZWT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF or ZWT?
As of September 16, 2026, TLF has returned 22.70% year to date, while ZWT has returned 18.53%. TLF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF or ZWT?
As of September 16, 2026, TLF manages $156.18 M in assets, while ZWT manages $213.23 M. ZWT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF and ZWT managed?
TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. ZWT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF and ZWT emphasize?
TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWT is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF or ZWT?
Year to date, TLF has seen +$3.85 M in net flows, compared with -$8.06 M for ZWT. TLF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF and ZWT compare?
TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while ZWT has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of TLF and ZWT?
TLF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. ZWT's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF or ZWT?
TLF holds 26 securities, while ZWT holds 30. On holdings count, ZWT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF and ZWT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.