ETF Market Canada › ETF Comparison › TLF.U vs ARTI

TLF.U vs ARTI ETF Comparison

ENFR
With ETF data and analysis by
Cboe
Back to Cboe homepageFR
TLF.U
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF
Full TLF.U fund page
VS
ARTI
Evolve Artificial Intelligence Fund
Full ARTI fund page

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.U) and Evolve Artificial Intelligence Fund (ARTI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TLF.U focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while ARTI leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Telecommunications. When evaluating costs, TLF.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.6% for ARTI. Performance-wise, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ARTI is at 14.38% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TLF.U
-2.22%-2.76%+27.05%+35.23%+110.91%
ARTI
+1.00%+7.55%+14.38%+17.22%-
Flows
TLF.U
+$1 M-$0 M+$0 M-$0 M-$1 M
ARTI
+$0 M-$2 M-$1 M+$3 M-

TLF.U vs ARTI exposure

Countries

TLF.U
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
ARTI
USA
89.89%
Other
10.11%

Sectors

TLF.U
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
ARTI
Technology
86.22%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.03%
As of September 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TLF.U
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
ARTI
Microsoft Corp.
10.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
10.03%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.33%
Broadcom Inc.
7.60%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.52%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6.48%
Oracle Corp.
3.34%
ASML Holding NV
3.11%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.37%

Diversification

TLF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
ARTI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 28 total
67.75%

Characteristics

Compare
TLF.U
ARTI
ProviderBrompton GroupEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.36%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 2, 2018March 22, 2024

Frequently asked questions about TLF.U and ARTI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF.U or ARTI?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year to date, while ARTI has returned 14.38%. TLF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF.U or ARTI?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U manages $4.82 M in assets, while ARTI manages $24.70 M. ARTI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF.U and ARTI managed?
TLF.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. ARTI is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF.U and ARTI emphasize?
TLF.U is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ARTI is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Telecommunications.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF.U or ARTI?
Year to date, TLF.U has seen +$0.37 M in net flows, compared with -$1.04 M for ARTI. TLF.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF.U and ARTI compare?
TLF.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while ARTI has an expense ratio of 0.97%.
What are the top holdings of TLF.U and ARTI?
TLF.U's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. ARTI's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF.U or ARTI?
TLF.U holds 26 securities, while ARTI holds 28. On holdings count, ARTI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about TLF.U and ARTI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds