VS
Compare Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.U) vs Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF (HTA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TLF.U provides Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while HTA is primarily weighted in Technology and Sovereign. When evaluating costs, TLF.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.85% for HTA. Performance-wise, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas HTA is at 25.05% with +$55 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF.U
HTA
| AuM | $4.82 M | $893.97 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF.U | -2.22% | -2.76% | +27.05% | +35.23% | +110.91% |
HTA | +0.72% | +0.14% | +25.05% | +26.75% | +95.09% | |
| Flows | TLF.U | +$1 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$1 M |
HTA | +$8 M | +$23 M | +$55 M | +$55 M | +$141 M |
TLF.U vs HTA exposure
Countries
TLF.U
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
HTA
USA
94.15%
Sectors
TLF.U
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
HTA
Technology
98.93%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF.U
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
HTA
Microsoft Corp.
5.91%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.44%
Oracle Corp.
5.37%
Intuit, Inc.
5.29%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
5.16%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.08%
Amphenol Corp.
5.07%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.97%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.96%
Diversification
TLF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
52.83%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF.U
HTA
| Provider | Brompton Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.36% | 8.21% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 2, 2018 | April 27, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF.U and HTA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF.U or HTA?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year to date, while HTA has returned 25.05%. TLF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF.U or HTA?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U manages $4.82 M in assets, while HTA manages $893.97 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF.U and HTA managed?
TLF.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF.U and HTA emphasize?
TLF.U is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. HTA is most exposed to Technology and Sovereign.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF.U or HTA?
Year to date, TLF.U has seen +$0.37 M in net flows, compared with +$54.95 M for HTA. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF.U and HTA compare?
TLF.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of TLF.U and HTA?
TLF.U's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. HTA's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF.U or HTA?
TLF.U holds 26 securities, while HTA holds 25. On holdings count, TLF.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF.U and HTA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.