TLF.U
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF

Full TLF.U fund page
VS
QQQT
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund

Full QQQT fund page

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.U) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund (QQQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TLF.U focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while QQQT leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, TLF.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.25% for QQQT. Performance-wise, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas QQQT is at 26.97% with +$21 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TLF.U
-2.22%-2.76%+27.05%+35.23%+110.91%
QQQT
-0.56%+0.94%+26.97%+34.93%+152.61%
Flows
TLF.U
+$1 M-$0 M+$0 M-$0 M-$1 M
QQQT
+$1 M+$7 M+$21 M+$40 M+$95 M

TLF.U vs QQQT exposure

Countries

TLF.U
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
QQQT
USA
95.14%

Sectors

TLF.U
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
QQQT
Technology
96.17%
As of September 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TLF.U
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
QQQT
Microsoft Corp.
11.46%
Apple, Inc.
10.92%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.27%
Broadcom Inc.
9.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.29%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.33%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.99%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.51%
Intel Corp.
2.47%

Diversification

TLF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
QQQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
71.61%

Characteristics

Compare
TLF.U
QQQT
ProviderBrompton GroupEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.36%0.24%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 2, 2018July 11, 2023

Frequently asked questions about TLF.U and QQQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF.U or QQQT?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year to date, while QQQT has returned 26.97%. TLF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF.U or QQQT?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U manages $4.82 M in assets, while QQQT manages $155.25 M. QQQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF.U and QQQT managed?
TLF.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. QQQT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do TLF.U and QQQT emphasize?
TLF.U is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QQQT is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF.U or QQQT?
Year to date, TLF.U has seen +$0.37 M in net flows, compared with +$21.29 M for QQQT. QQQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF.U and QQQT compare?
TLF.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while QQQT has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What are the top holdings of TLF.U and QQQT?
TLF.U's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. QQQT's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF.U or QQQT?
TLF.U holds 26 securities, while QQQT holds 46. On holdings count, QQQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about TLF.U and QQQT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds