VS
Compare Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.U) vs Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TLF.U and TLF provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, TLF.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.75% for TLF. Performance-wise, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas TLF is at 25.29% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF.U
TLF
| AuM | $4.82 M | $159.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF.U | -2.22% | -2.76% | +27.05% | +35.23% | +110.91% |
TLF | -2.35% | -3.17% | +25.29% | +32.59% | +99.85% | |
| Flows | TLF.U | +$1 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$1 M |
TLF | -$1 M | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
TLF.U vs TLF exposure
Countries
TLF.U
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
Sectors
TLF.U
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF.U
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
Diversification
TLF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF.U
TLF
| Provider | Brompton Group | Brompton Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.36% | 5.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 2, 2018 | May 20, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF.U and TLF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF.U or TLF?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year to date, while TLF has returned 25.29%. TLF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF.U or TLF?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U manages $4.82 M in assets, while TLF manages $159.48 M. TLF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF.U and TLF managed?
TLF.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF.U and TLF emphasize?
TLF.U is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF.U or TLF?
Year to date, TLF.U has seen +$0.37 M in net flows, compared with +$3.85 M for TLF. TLF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF.U and TLF compare?
TLF.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of TLF.U and TLF?
TLF.U's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. TLF's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF.U or TLF?
TLF.U holds 26 securities, while TLF holds 26. On holdings count, TLF.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF.U and TLF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.