VS
Compare Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.U) vs BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TLF.U provides Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ZWT is primarily weighted in Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, TLF.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.65% for ZWT. Performance-wise, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZWT is at 19.2% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF.U
ZWT
| AuM | $4.82 M | $214.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF.U | -2.22% | -2.76% | +27.05% | +35.23% | +110.91% |
ZWT | +3.79% | +0.09% | +19.20% | +22.61% | +132.30% | |
| Flows | TLF.U | +$1 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$1 M |
ZWT | -$0 M | -$3 M | -$8 M | -$2 M | +$31 M |
TLF.U vs ZWT exposure
Countries
TLF.U
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
ZWT
USA
99.05%
Sectors
TLF.U
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
ZWT
Technology
89.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.94%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF.U
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
ZWT
Apple, Inc.
9.60%
Microsoft Corp.
9.39%
Broadcom Inc.
8.13%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.94%
Alphabet, Inc.
7.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.19%
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.39%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.78%
Diversification
TLF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
ZWT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
71.33%
Characteristics
Compare
TLF.U
ZWT
| Provider | Brompton Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.36% | 4.91% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 2, 2018 | January 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF.U and ZWT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF.U or ZWT?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U has returned 27.05% year to date, while ZWT has returned 19.20%. TLF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF.U or ZWT?
As of September 17, 2026, TLF.U manages $4.82 M in assets, while ZWT manages $214.43 M. ZWT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF.U and ZWT managed?
TLF.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. ZWT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TLF.U and ZWT emphasize?
TLF.U is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWT is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF.U or ZWT?
Year to date, TLF.U has seen +$0.37 M in net flows, compared with -$8.06 M for ZWT. TLF.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF.U and ZWT compare?
TLF.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while ZWT has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of TLF.U and ZWT?
TLF.U's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. ZWT's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TLF.U or ZWT?
TLF.U holds 26 securities, while ZWT holds 30. On holdings count, ZWT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TLF.U and ZWT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.