TQGM
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF

Full TQGM fund page
VS
CGQD.B
CI Global Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF

Full CGQD.B fund page

TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM) and CI Global Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (CGQD.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TQGM focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while CGQD.B leans towards Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, TQGM features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.45% for CGQD.B. Performance-wise, TQGM has returned 15.59% year-to-date with +$829 M in net flows, whereas CGQD.B is at 11.02% with +$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.5%Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TQGM
-1.80%+0.03%+15.59%+15.64%+83.95%
CGQD.B
-1.00%+0.71%+11.02%+10.65%-
Flows
TQGM
+$97 M+$239 M+$829 M+$937 M+$1,308 M
CGQD.B
+$1 M+$1 M+$8 M+$13 M-

TQGM vs CGQD.B exposure

Countries

TQGM
USA
53.40%
Japan
9.80%
Other
36.80%
CGQD.B
USA
72.60%
Other
27.40%

Sectors

TQGM
Technology
24.60%
Finance
17.48%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.73%
Industrials
11.82%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.21%
Other
24.17%
CGQD.B
Technology
34.01%
Industrials
12.67%
Healthcare
11.45%
Finance
10.15%
Other
31.72%
As of October 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TQGM
Microsoft Corp.
1.57%
Apple, Inc.
1.55%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.48%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.46%
Broadcom Inc.
1.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.43%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.29%
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
1.13%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.06%
CGQD.B
CA12559L1031
72.48%
CA17165X2014
23.66%
CA17165G1090
3.51%

Diversification

TQGM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 429 total
13.97%
CGQD.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 546 total
99.65%

Characteristics

Compare
TQGM
CGQD.B
ProviderTD Asset ManagementCI
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.92%0.63%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 26, 2019September 6, 2024

Frequently asked questions about TQGM and CGQD.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TQGM or CGQD.B?
As of October 30, 2026, TQGM has returned 15.59% year to date, while CGQD.B has returned 11.02%. TQGM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TQGM or CGQD.B?
As of October 30, 2026, TQGM manages $1.60 B in assets, while CGQD.B manages $48.66 M. TQGM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TQGM and CGQD.B managed?
TQGM is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. CGQD.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: TQGM or CGQD.B?
TQGM holds 424 securities, while CGQD.B holds 1. On holdings count, TQGM is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TQGM or CGQD.B?
Year to date, TQGM has seen +$829.28 M in net flows, compared with +$8.48 M for CGQD.B. TQGM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TQGM and CGQD.B compare?
TQGM has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while CGQD.B has an expense ratio of 0.47%.
What sectors do TQGM and CGQD.B emphasize?
TQGM is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CGQD.B is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds