VS
When evaluating costs, TQGM features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for GDIV. Performance-wise, TQGM has returned 15.59% year-to-date with +$829 M in net flows, whereas GDIV is at 18.71% with +$77 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TQGM
GDIV
| AuM | $1,603.35 M | $95.46 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.37% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TQGM | -1.80% | +0.03% | +15.59% | +15.64% | +83.95% |
GDIV | -1.32% | -1.15% | +18.71% | +17.88% | +76.45% | |
| Flows | TQGM | +$97 M | +$239 M | +$829 M | +$937 M | +$1,308 M |
GDIV | +$5 M | +$22 M | +$77 M | +$81 M | +$74 M |
TQGM vs GDIV exposure
Countries
TQGM
USA
53.40%
Japan
9.80%
Other
36.80%
GDIV
Other
100.00%
Sectors
TQGM
Technology
24.60%
Finance
17.48%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.73%
Industrials
11.82%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.21%
Other
24.17%
GDIV
Other
100.00%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TQGM
Microsoft Corp.
1.57%
Apple, Inc.
1.55%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.48%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.46%
Broadcom Inc.
1.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.43%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.29%
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
1.13%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.06%
GDIV
CA56503P1080
68.05%
CA56503T1003
24.06%
CA56502U1084
5.64%
CA56502Q1072
2.01%
Diversification
TQGM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 429 total
13.97%
GDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
99.76%
Characteristics
Compare
TQGM
GDIV
| Provider | TD Asset Management | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.92% | 1.50% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 26, 2019 | May 15, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TQGM and GDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TQGM or GDIV?
As of October 30, 2026, TQGM has returned 15.59% year to date, while GDIV has returned 18.71%. GDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TQGM or GDIV?
As of October 30, 2026, TQGM manages $1.60 B in assets, while GDIV manages $95.46 M. TQGM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TQGM and GDIV managed?
TQGM is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. GDIV is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TQGM or GDIV?
Year to date, TQGM has seen +$829.28 M in net flows, compared with +$76.61 M for GDIV. TQGM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TQGM and GDIV compare?
TQGM has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while GDIV has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
Which ETF is more diversified: TQGM or GDIV?
TQGM holds 424 securities, while GDIV holds 1. On holdings count, TQGM is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TQGM and GDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.