TTLT
BetaPro 3x US Treasury 20+ Year Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF

Full TTLT fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, TTLT features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, TTLT has returned 5.26% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 26.84% with -$417 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

024681012%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TTLT
+11.89%-4.09%-5.26%--
HBNK
+9.01%+23.92%+26.84%+69.96%-
Flows
TTLT
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M--
HBNK
+$16 M-$167 M-$417 M-$668 M-

TTLT vs HBNK exposure

Countries

TTLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%

Sectors

TTLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TTLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%

Diversification

TTLT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%

Characteristics

Compare
TTLT
HBNK
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.64%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 11, 2025July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about TTLT and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TTLT or HBNK?
As of June 16, 2026, TTLT has returned -5.26% year to date, while HBNK has returned 26.84%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TTLT or HBNK?
As of June 16, 2026, TTLT manages $4.65 M in assets, while HBNK manages $798.57 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TTLT and HBNK managed?
TTLT is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TTLT or HBNK?
Year to date, TTLT has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$416.98 M for HBNK. TTLT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TTLT and HBNK compare?
TTLT has an expense ratio of 1.15%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about TTLT and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds