VS
TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend ETF (TUED) and NBI Active U.S. Equity ETF (NUSA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TUED focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Industrials, and Finance, while NUSA leans towards Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, TUED features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.55% for NUSA. Performance-wise, TUED has returned 11.28% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas NUSA is at 4.54% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TUED
NUSA
| AuM | $658.60 M | $91.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.62% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TUED | -8.09% | +2.04% | +11.28% | +14.02% | +88.20% |
NUSA | -1.67% | +4.44% | +4.54% | +7.37% | +49.49% | |
| Flows | TUED | +$7 M | +$9 M | -$4 M | -$13 M | +$217 M |
NUSA | +$0 M | -$13 M | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$50 M |
TUED vs NUSA exposure
Countries
TUED
USA
86.38%
Other
9.18%
NUSA
USA
95.57%
Sectors
TUED
Technology
42.44%
Industrials
19.06%
Finance
9.71%
Other
9.18%
Healthcare
7.17%
Other
12.45%
NUSA
Technology
48.34%
Finance
12.15%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.75%
Healthcare
8.43%
Industrials
7.10%
Other
12.23%
As of July 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TUED
NVIDIA Corp.
8.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.64%
GE Vernova, Inc.
5.01%
Apple, Inc.
4.81%
Caterpillar, Inc.
4.56%
Broadcom Inc.
4.00%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.38%
Microsoft Corp.
3.32%
Sandisk Corp.
3.00%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
2.94%
NUSA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.37%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.83%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.62%
Microsoft Corp.
6.48%
Broadcom Inc.
5.79%
Lam Research Corp.
5.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.64%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.03%
Apple, Inc.
3.84%
Danaher Corp.
3.61%
Diversification
TUED
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
45.91%
NUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
55.41%
Characteristics
Compare
TUED
NUSA
| Provider | TD Asset Management | National Bank Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.24% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | February 13, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about TUED and NUSA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TUED or NUSA?
As of July 30, 2026, TUED has returned 11.28% year to date, while NUSA has returned 4.54%. TUED is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TUED or NUSA?
As of July 30, 2026, TUED manages $658.60 M in assets, while NUSA manages $91.96 M. TUED is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TUED and NUSA managed?
TUED is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. NUSA is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TUED and NUSA emphasize?
TUED is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Finance. NUSA is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TUED or NUSA?
Year to date, TUED has seen -$4.29 M in net flows, compared with +$3.58 M for NUSA. NUSA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TUED and NUSA compare?
TUED has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while NUSA has an expense ratio of 0.62%.
What are the top holdings of TUED and NUSA?
TUED's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and GE Vernova, Inc.. NUSA's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TUED or NUSA?
TUED holds 41 securities, while NUSA holds 30. On holdings count, TUED is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TUED and NUSA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.