VS
Manulife Smart U.S. Defensive Equity ETF (UDEF) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that UDEF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials, while XMS leans towards Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials. When evaluating costs, UDEF features a management fee (MER) of 0.33%, compared to 0.3% for XMS. Performance-wise, UDEF has returned 8.54% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas XMS is at 0.21% with -$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
UDEF
XMS
| AuM | $2.88 M | $51.65 M |
| Management Fees | 0.33% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.37% | 0.33% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 0.15% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UDEF | +3.86% | +6.76% | +8.54% | +14.19% | +42.25% |
XMS | +0.98% | -0.41% | +0.21% | +1.49% | +29.13% | |
| Flows | UDEF | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$0 M |
XMS | +$2 M | -$11 M | -$6 M | +$0 M | -$4 M |
UDEF vs XMS exposure
Countries
UDEF
USA
92.12%
Other
7.88%
XMS
USA
93.27%
Sectors
UDEF
Information Technology
31.89%
Health Care
12.13%
Financials
11.61%
Industrials
11.55%
Communication Services
7.27%
Other
25.54%
XMS
Information Technology
30.20%
Health Care
12.63%
Financials
11.59%
Consumer Staples
9.92%
Utilities
7.58%
Other
28.08%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
UDEF
APPLIED MATERIAL
2.21%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
2.20%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.13%
ANALOG DEVICES
2.02%
MICROSOFT-T
1.93%
APPLE
1.91%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.91%
MASTERCARD
1.91%
MCDONALD'S
1.90%
MERCK & CO INC
1.89%
XMS
CISCO-T
1.80%
NVIDIA
1.63%
EXXON
1.60%
MICROSOFT-T
1.55%
DUKE ENERGY
1.54%
SOUTHERN
1.52%
AMPHENOL
1.50%
CHUBB LTD
1.49%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.48%
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1.47%
Diversification
UDEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 167 total
20.00%
XMS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 170 total
15.58%
Characteristics
Compare
UDEF
XMS
| Provider | Manulife Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.16% | 1.20% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 10, 2021 | April 5, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about UDEF and XMS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: UDEF or XMS?
As of June 11, 2026, UDEF has returned 8.54% year to date, while XMS has returned 0.21%. UDEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UDEF or XMS?
As of June 11, 2026, UDEF manages $2.88 M in assets, while XMS manages $51.65 M. XMS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UDEF and XMS managed?
UDEF is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index. XMS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UDEF and XMS emphasize?
UDEF is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials. XMS is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UDEF or XMS?
Year to date, UDEF has seen +$1.39 M in net flows, compared with -$5.64 M for XMS. UDEF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UDEF and XMS compare?
UDEF has an expense ratio of 0.37%, while XMS has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of UDEF and XMS?
UDEF's largest holdings include APPLIED MATERIAL and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS. XMS's top holdings include CISCO-T and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: UDEF or XMS?
UDEF holds 163 securities, while XMS holds 165. On holdings count, XMS is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.