ULV.U
CI Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility Index ETF

Full ULV.U fund page
VS
CUD
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF

Full CUD fund page

CI Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility Index ETF (ULV.U) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CUD) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ULV.U focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Industrials, while CUD leans towards Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ULV.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.6% for CUD. Performance-wise, ULV.U has returned 9.9% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas CUD is at 17.93% with -$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

024681012%Oct 2Oct 9Oct 19Oct 26Nov 2

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ULV.U
+9.14%+1.56%+9.90%+12.01%+36.30%
CUD
+11.32%+4.59%+17.93%+20.91%+44.10%
Flows
ULV.U
+$0 M+$0 M-$1 M-$2 M-$1 M
CUD
-$3 M-$7 M-$28 M-$33 M-$141 M

ULV.U vs CUD exposure

Countries

ULV.U
USA
95.88%
CUD
USA
91.68%
Other
8.32%

Sectors

ULV.U
Finance
41.08%
Utilities
26.23%
Industrials
9.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
15.61%
CUD
Finance
15.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.61%
Industrials
14.24%
Utilities
12.55%
Technology
9.37%
Healthcare
8.34%
Other
25.36%
As of November 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ULV.U
US46138E3541
99.94%
CUD
Verizon Communications, Inc.
3.17%
Accenture Plc
3.14%
Chevron Corp.
2.08%
Realty Income Corp.
2.00%
PepsiCo, Inc.
1.87%
Target Corp.
1.81%
Medtronic Plc
1.77%
NIKE, Inc.
1.53%
Kenvue, Inc.
1.52%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.48%

Diversification

ULV.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
99.94%
CUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 155 total
20.37%

Characteristics

Compare
ULV.U
CUD
ProviderCIiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 Low Volatility Total Return Index - USDS&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.47%1.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 31, 2017September 13, 2011

Frequently asked questions about ULV.U and CUD

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ULV.U or CUD?
As of November 2, 2026, ULV.U has returned 9.90% year to date, while CUD has returned 17.93%. CUD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ULV.U or CUD?
As of November 2, 2026, ULV.U manages $5.33 M in assets, while CUD manages $247.95 M. CUD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ULV.U and CUD managed?
ULV.U is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Total Return Index - USD benchmark. CUD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ULV.U or CUD?
ULV.U holds 1 securities, while CUD holds 155. On holdings count, CUD is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ULV.U or CUD?
Year to date, ULV.U has seen -$1.13 M in net flows, compared with -$27.73 M for CUD. ULV.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ULV.U and CUD compare?
ULV.U has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while CUD has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What sectors do ULV.U and CUD emphasize?
ULV.U is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Industrials. CUD is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials.

Recent articles about ULV.U and CUD

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds