VS
Compare CI Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility Index ETF (ULV.U) vs CI Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility Index ETF (ULV.C) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ULV.U and ULV.C provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Utilities, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ULV.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for ULV.C. Performance-wise, ULV.U has returned 9.9% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ULV.C is at 12.36% with -$13 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ULV.U
ULV.C
| AuM | $5.34 M | $22.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.31% | 0.31% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.95% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ULV.U | +9.14% | +1.56% | +9.90% | +12.01% | +36.30% |
ULV.C | +7.46% | +1.25% | +12.36% | +11.58% | +38.51% | |
| Flows | ULV.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$2 M | -$1 M |
ULV.C | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$13 M | -$13 M | -$8 M |
ULV.U vs ULV.C exposure
Countries
ULV.U
USA
95.88%
ULV.C
USA
95.88%
Sectors
ULV.U
Finance
41.08%
Utilities
26.23%
Industrials
9.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
15.61%
ULV.C
Finance
41.08%
Utilities
26.23%
Industrials
9.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
15.61%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ULV.U
US46138E3541
99.94%
ULV.C
US46138E3541
99.94%
Diversification
ULV.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
99.94%
ULV.C
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
ULV.U
ULV.C
| Provider | CI | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Low Volatility Total Return Index - USD | S&P 500 Low Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Other | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.47% | 1.69% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 31, 2017 | January 31, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about ULV.U and ULV.C
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ULV.U or ULV.C?
As of November 2, 2026, ULV.U has returned 9.90% year to date, while ULV.C has returned 12.36%. ULV.C is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ULV.U or ULV.C?
As of November 2, 2026, ULV.U manages $5.34 M in assets, while ULV.C manages $22.89 M. ULV.C is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ULV.U and ULV.C managed?
ULV.U is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ULV.C is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ULV.U or ULV.C?
ULV.U holds 1 securities, while ULV.C holds 1. On holdings count, ULV.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ULV.U or ULV.C?
Year to date, ULV.U has seen -$1.13 M in net flows, compared with -$13.35 M for ULV.C. ULV.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ULV.U and ULV.C compare?
ULV.U has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while ULV.C has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What sectors do ULV.U and ULV.C emphasize?
ULV.U is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Industrials. ULV.C is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Industrials.
Recent articles about ULV.U and ULV.C
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.