VS
Compare Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP) vs iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. UMVP provides Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications exposures, while XUT is primarily weighted in Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, UMVP features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.55% for XUT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
UMVP
XUT
| AuM | $314.11 M | $678.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.19% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.16% | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMVP | +1.52% | +7.38% | - | - | - |
XUT | +0.89% | +8.38% | +19.00% | +25.97% | +53.73% | |
| Flows | UMVP | +$10 M | +$25 M | - | - | - |
XUT | +$25 M | -$8 M | +$326 M | +$274 M | +$284 M |
UMVP vs XUT exposure
Countries
UMVP
Canada
83.40%
Bermuda
16.43%
XUT
Canada
80.26%
Bermuda
19.33%
Sectors
UMVP
Utilities
35.13%
Energy
33.43%
Telecommunications
23.05%
Industrials
8.21%
XUT
Utilities
76.50%
Industrials
13.13%
Energy
9.96%
As of July 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
UMVP
Fortis, Inc.
9.09%
Emera, Inc.
9.05%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
TC Energy Corp.
8.57%
Enbridge, Inc.
8.42%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
8.23%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.22%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.21%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.21%
BCE, Inc.
7.78%
XUT
Fortis, Inc.
22.92%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
13.13%
Emera, Inc.
12.75%
Hydro One Ltd.
10.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
9.04%
Capital Power Corp.
6.41%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
6.20%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.78%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.24%
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
3.23%
Diversification
UMVP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.55%
XUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 14 total
91.01%
Characteristics
Compare
UMVP
XUT
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 3.05% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2026 | April 12, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about UMVP and XUT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UMVP or XUT?
As of July 29, 2026, UMVP manages $314.11 M in assets, while XUT manages $678.96 M. XUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UMVP and XUT managed?
UMVP is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index - CAD benchmark. XUT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UMVP and XUT emphasize?
UMVP is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications. XUT is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
How do the fees of UMVP and XUT compare?
UMVP has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while XUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of UMVP and XUT?
UMVP's largest holdings include Fortis, Inc., Emera, Inc., and Canadian Utilities Ltd.. XUT's top holdings include Fortis, Inc., Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP, and Emera, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: UMVP or XUT?
UMVP holds 12 securities, while XUT holds 14. On holdings count, XUT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about UMVP and XUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.