VS
When evaluating costs, UTES features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.6% for OILY. Performance-wise, UTES has returned 3.42% year-to-date with +$224 M in net flows, whereas OILY is at 37.61% with +$31 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
UTES
OILY
| AuM | $436.21 M | $47.33 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.84% | 0.60% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UTES | -2.21% | -10.16% | +3.42% | +3.92% | - |
OILY | +4.10% | +3.32% | +37.61% | +41.05% | - | |
| Flows | UTES | +$30 M | +$114 M | +$224 M | +$329 M | - |
OILY | +$13 M | +$21 M | +$31 M | +$36 M | - |
UTES vs OILY exposure
Countries
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
OILY
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
OILY
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
OILY
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
OILY
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
UTES
OILY
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 18.27% | 12.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 3, 2024 | March 26, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about UTES and OILY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: UTES or OILY?
As of September 10, 2026, UTES has returned 3.42% year to date, while OILY has returned 37.61%. OILY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UTES or OILY?
As of September 10, 2026, UTES manages $436.21 M in assets, while OILY manages $47.33 M. UTES is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UTES and OILY managed?
UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. OILY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UTES or OILY?
Year to date, UTES has seen +$223.67 M in net flows, compared with +$31.42 M for OILY. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UTES and OILY compare?
UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%, while OILY has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.