UTES
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full UTES fund page
VS
OILY
Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full OILY fund page

Compare Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES) vs Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund (OILY) to find the best fit for your portfolio. UTES provides Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services exposures, while OILY is primarily weighted in Energy. When evaluating costs, UTES features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.6% for OILY. Performance-wise, UTES has returned 7.37% year-to-date with +$82 M in net flows, whereas OILY is at 22.54% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
UTES
-2.73%+5.71%+7.37%+16.72%-
OILY
-6.28%+14.53%+22.54%+40.08%-
Flows
UTES
+$35 M+$62 M+$82 M+$250 M-
OILY
+$1 M+$9 M+$11 M+$22 M-

UTES vs OILY exposure

Countries

UTES
Canada
100.17%
OILY
Canada
89.74%
Other
10.26%

Sectors

UTES
Utilities
40.77%
Energy
31.24%
Communication Services
28.15%
OILY
Energy
89.74%
Other
10.26%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

UTES
ALTAGAS
10.83%
ENBRIDGE
10.56%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
10.35%
TC ENERGY CORP
10.33%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
10.07%
EMERA
10.02%
HYDRO ONE
9.97%
FORTIS
9.95%
BCE
9.31%
TELUS
8.78%
OILY
CENOVUS ENERGY
11.50%
SUNCOR ENERGY
10.90%
IMPERIAL OIL
10.40%
KEYERA
9.89%
ENBRIDGE
9.55%
ARC RESOURCES
9.51%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
9.34%
TC ENERGY CORP
9.33%
TOURMALINE OIL
9.32%

Diversification

UTES
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.17%
OILY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
89.74%

Characteristics

Compare
UTES
OILY
ProviderEvolve ETFsEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield14.84%12.24%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 3, 2024March 26, 2025

Frequently asked questions about UTES and OILY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: UTES or OILY?
As of April 24, 2026, UTES has returned 7.37% year to date, while OILY has returned 22.54%. OILY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UTES or OILY?
As of April 24, 2026, UTES manages $342.23 M in assets, while OILY manages $25.70 M. UTES is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UTES and OILY managed?
UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. OILY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do UTES and OILY emphasize?
UTES is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. OILY is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UTES or OILY?
Year to date, UTES has seen +$81.82 M in net flows, compared with +$11.45 M for OILY. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UTES and OILY compare?
UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%, while OILY has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of UTES and OILY?
UTES's largest holdings include ALTAGAS, ENBRIDGE, and PEMBINA PIPELINE. OILY's top holdings include CENOVUS ENERGY, SUNCOR ENERGY, and IMPERIAL OIL.
Which ETF is more diversified: UTES or OILY?
UTES holds 10 securities, while OILY holds 9. On holdings count, UTES is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds