UTES
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full UTES fund page
VS
RING
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF

Full RING fund page

Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF (RING) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that UTES focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services, while RING leans towards Communication Services. When evaluating costs, UTES features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for RING. Performance-wise, UTES has returned 13.57% year-to-date with +$109 M in net flows, whereas RING is at 1.6% with +$19 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 9, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
UTES
+3.06%+2.94%+13.57%+25.67%-
RING
+2.70%-3.63%+1.60%+14.89%-
Flows
UTES
+$21 M+$72 M+$109 M+$261 M-
RING
-$28 M+$146 M+$19 M+$485 M-

UTES vs RING exposure

Countries

UTES
Canada
100.40%
RING
Canada
99.96%

Sectors

UTES
Utilities
42.59%
Energy
30.89%
Communication Services
26.92%
RING
Communication Services
99.96%
As of June 9, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

UTES
ALTAGAS
11.67%
HYDRO ONE
10.42%
ENBRIDGE
10.37%
TC ENERGY CORP
10.36%
EMERA
10.32%
FORTIS
10.19%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
10.16%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
9.70%
BCE
8.80%
TELUS
8.42%
RING
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
34.71%
BCE
33.53%
TELUS
31.72%

Diversification

UTES
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.40%
RING
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3 total
99.96%

Characteristics

Compare
UTES
RING
ProviderEvolve ETFsGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield15.89%5.65%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 3, 2024November 7, 2024

Frequently asked questions about UTES and RING

Which ETF has performed better year to date: UTES or RING?
As of June 9, 2026, UTES has returned 13.57% year to date, while RING has returned 1.60%. UTES is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UTES or RING?
As of June 9, 2026, UTES manages $379.28 M in assets, while RING manages $589.23 M. RING is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UTES and RING managed?
UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. RING is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UTES and RING emphasize?
UTES is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. RING is most exposed to Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UTES or RING?
Year to date, UTES has seen +$109.37 M in net flows, compared with +$19.18 M for RING. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UTES and RING compare?
UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%, while RING has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of UTES and RING?
UTES's largest holdings include ALTAGAS, HYDRO ONE, and ENBRIDGE. RING's top holdings include ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS, BCE, and TELUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: UTES or RING?
UTES holds 10 securities, while RING holds 3. On holdings count, UTES is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about UTES and RING

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds