UTES
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full UTES fund page
VS
XUT
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF

Full XUT fund page

Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that UTES focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services, while XUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, UTES features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.55% for XUT. Performance-wise, UTES has returned 7.37% year-to-date with +$82 M in net flows, whereas XUT is at 11.3% with +$306 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.0%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
UTES
-2.73%+5.71%+7.37%+16.72%-
XUT
+2.79%+9.83%+11.30%+25.81%+35.86%
Flows
UTES
+$35 M+$62 M+$82 M+$250 M-
XUT
+$182 M+$281 M+$306 M+$235 M+$270 M

UTES vs XUT exposure

Countries

UTES
Canada
100.17%
XUT
Canada
80.13%
Bermuda
19.53%

Sectors

UTES
Utilities
40.77%
Energy
31.24%
Communication Services
28.15%
XUT
Utilities
99.66%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

UTES
ALTAGAS
10.83%
ENBRIDGE
10.56%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
10.35%
TC ENERGY CORP
10.33%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
10.07%
EMERA
10.02%
HYDRO ONE
9.97%
FORTIS
9.95%
BCE
9.31%
TELUS
8.78%
XUT
FORTIS
22.94%
BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP UNIT
13.46%
EMERA
12.68%
HYDRO ONE
10.64%
ALTAGAS
8.75%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
6.07%
CAPITAL POWER
6.00%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
3.69%
NORTHLAND POWER
3.56%
ALGONQUIN POWER
3.47%

Diversification

UTES
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.17%
XUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 14 total
91.25%

Characteristics

Compare
UTES
XUT
ProviderEvolve ETFsiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield14.84%3.45%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 3, 2024April 12, 2011

Frequently asked questions about UTES and XUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: UTES or XUT?
As of April 24, 2026, UTES has returned 7.37% year to date, while XUT has returned 11.30%. XUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UTES or XUT?
As of April 24, 2026, UTES manages $342.23 M in assets, while XUT manages $623.56 M. XUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UTES and XUT managed?
UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. XUT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UTES and XUT emphasize?
UTES is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. XUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UTES or XUT?
Year to date, UTES has seen +$81.82 M in net flows, compared with +$306.41 M for XUT. XUT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UTES and XUT compare?
UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%, while XUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of UTES and XUT?
UTES's largest holdings include ALTAGAS, ENBRIDGE, and PEMBINA PIPELINE. XUT's top holdings include FORTIS, BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP UNIT, and EMERA.
Which ETF is more diversified: UTES or XUT?
UTES holds 10 securities, while XUT holds 14. On holdings count, XUT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about UTES and XUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds