UTES
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full UTES fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that UTES focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, UTES features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, UTES has returned 8.34% year-to-date with +$87 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.32% with -$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
UTES
-2.79%+5.37%+8.34%+17.50%-
ZUT
-0.63%+12.47%+15.32%+28.73%+38.60%
Flows
UTES
+$37 M+$64 M+$87 M+$254 M-
ZUT
+$25 M-$37 M-$60 M+$129 M+$254 M

UTES vs ZUT exposure

Countries

UTES
Canada
100.17%
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

UTES
Utilities
40.77%
Energy
31.24%
Communication Services
28.15%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of April 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

UTES
ALTAGAS
10.83%
ENBRIDGE
10.56%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
10.35%
TC ENERGY CORP
10.33%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
10.07%
EMERA
10.02%
HYDRO ONE
9.97%
FORTIS
9.95%
BCE
9.31%
TELUS
8.78%
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

UTES
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.17%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
UTES
ZUT
ProviderEvolve ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield14.70%2.91%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 3, 2024January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about UTES and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: UTES or ZUT?
As of April 30, 2026, UTES has returned 8.34% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.32%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UTES or ZUT?
As of April 30, 2026, UTES manages $350.50 M in assets, while ZUT manages $873.00 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UTES and ZUT managed?
UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UTES and ZUT emphasize?
UTES is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UTES or ZUT?
Year to date, UTES has seen +$86.98 M in net flows, compared with -$60.16 M for ZUT. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UTES and ZUT compare?
UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of UTES and ZUT?
UTES's largest holdings include ALTAGAS, ENBRIDGE, and PEMBINA PIPELINE. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: UTES or ZUT?
UTES holds 10 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about UTES and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds