VCNS
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio

Full VCNS fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VCNS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Sovereign, Municipal, and Information Technology, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, VCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, VCNS has returned 2.54% year-to-date with +$98 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 11.92% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 28, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VCNS
+3.67%+0.97%+2.54%+13.18%+32.73%
HEWB
+12.65%+11.10%+11.92%+63.43%+112.75%
Flows
VCNS
+$16 M+$74 M+$98 M+$254 M+$254 M
HEWB
+$8 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

VCNS vs HEWB exposure

Countries

VCNS
Canada
47.84%
USA
29.01%
Other
23.15%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

VCNS
Sovereign
19.60%
Other
16.25%
Municipal
10.70%
Information Technology
7.94%
Financials
7.62%
Other
37.89%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of April 28, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VCNS
NVIDIA
1.12%
APPLE
1.04%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.86%
MICROSOFT-T
0.77%
TORONTO DOMINION
0.59%
CA135087T537
0.56%
AMAZON.COM INC
0.56%
CA135087T792
0.55%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
0.55%
CA135087T388
0.51%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34,004 total
7.12%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
VCNS
HEWB
ProviderVanguardGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.50%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2018January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about VCNS and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VCNS or HEWB?
As of April 28, 2026, VCNS has returned 2.54% year to date, while HEWB has returned 11.92%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VCNS or HEWB?
As of April 28, 2026, VCNS manages $847.68 M in assets, while HEWB manages $282.40 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VCNS and HEWB managed?
VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VCNS and HEWB emphasize?
VCNS is most exposed to Sovereign, Municipal, and Information Technology. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VCNS or HEWB?
Year to date, VCNS has seen +$97.98 M in net flows, compared with +$12.19 M for HEWB. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VCNS and HEWB compare?
VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of VCNS and HEWB?
VCNS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: VCNS or HEWB?
VCNS holds 24941 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, VCNS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VCNS and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds