VS
When evaluating costs, VCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.27% for TCON. Performance-wise, VCNS has returned 5.01% year-to-date with +$219 M in net flows, whereas TCON is at 5.41% with +$52 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VCNS
TCON
| AuM | $977.26 M | $136.82 M |
| Management Fees | 0.22% | 0.27% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.25% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VCNS | +0.61% | -0.30% | +5.01% | +4.92% | +41.39% |
TCON | +0.38% | +0.03% | +5.41% | +5.34% | +38.41% | |
| Flows | VCNS | +$16 M | +$45 M | +$219 M | +$288 M | +$392 M |
TCON | +$2 M | +$9 M | +$52 M | +$62 M | +$108 M |
VCNS vs TCON exposure
Countries
VCNS
Canada
45.42%
USA
28.88%
Other
25.70%
TCON
Other
100.00%
Sectors
VCNS
Sovereign
24.86%
Finance
18.35%
Technology
11.79%
Municipal
10.90%
Other
34.11%
TCON
Other
100.00%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.34%
Apple, Inc.
1.25%
Microsoft Corp.
0.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.97%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.68%
Shopify, Inc.
0.64%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.63%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.62%
Canada, Bonds 3% 1sep2031, CAD
0.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.52%
TCON
CA87818P1036
59.91%
CA87239X1078
15.42%
CA87240Y1025
14.69%
CA87809R1001
9.97%
Diversification
VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,904 total
8.24%
TCON
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
99.99%
Characteristics
Compare
VCNS
TCON
| Provider | Vanguard | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.56% | 2.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2018 | August 18, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about VCNS and TCON
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VCNS or TCON?
As of October 30, 2026, VCNS has returned 5.01% year to date, while TCON has returned 5.41%. TCON is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VCNS or TCON?
As of October 30, 2026, VCNS manages $977.26 M in assets, while TCON manages $136.82 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VCNS and TCON managed?
VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. TCON is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VCNS or TCON?
Year to date, VCNS has seen +$218.95 M in net flows, compared with +$51.97 M for TCON. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VCNS and TCON compare?
VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%, while TCON has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Which ETF is more diversified: VCNS or TCON?
VCNS holds 28079 securities, while TCON holds 1. On holdings count, VCNS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VCNS and TCON
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.