VS
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF (XCNS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VCNS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Sovereign, Municipal, and Information Technology, while XCNS leans towards Sovereign, Municipal, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, VCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.18% for XCNS. Performance-wise, VCNS has returned 5.6% year-to-date with +$133 M in net flows, whereas XCNS is at 5.68% with +$72 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VCNS
XCNS
| AuM | $908.54 M | $403.34 M |
| Management Fees | 0.22% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.25% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VCNS | +1.90% | +5.69% | +5.60% | +13.28% | +38.12% |
XCNS | +1.93% | +5.88% | +5.68% | +13.53% | +38.03% | |
| Flows | VCNS | +$29 M | +$57 M | +$133 M | +$273 M | +$286 M |
XCNS | +$9 M | +$29 M | +$72 M | +$145 M | +$247 M |
VCNS vs XCNS exposure
Countries
VCNS
Canada
47.26%
USA
29.03%
Other
23.72%
XCNS
Canada
56.29%
USA
28.95%
Other
14.76%
Sectors
VCNS
Sovereign
18.68%
Other
17.12%
Municipal
10.52%
Information Technology
8.81%
Financials
7.84%
Other
37.04%
XCNS
Other
15.68%
Sovereign
13.12%
Municipal
10.15%
Information Technology
8.71%
Financials
7.75%
Other
44.59%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VCNS
NVIDIA
1.22%
APPLE
1.06%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.89%
MICROSOFT-T
0.80%
AMAZON.COM INC
0.68%
TORONTO DOMINION
0.64%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.59%
CA135087T537
0.56%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
0.53%
BROADCOM LIMITED
0.53%
XCNS
NVIDIA
1.32%
APPLE
1.08%
MICROSOFT-T
0.82%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.74%
AMAZON.COM INC
0.70%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.61%
CA135087T537
0.59%
CA135087T388
0.58%
CA135087T792
0.56%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2035, CAD
0.55%
Diversification
VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,945 total
7.50%
XCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21,767 total
7.55%
Characteristics
Compare
VCNS
XCNS
| Provider | Vanguard | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.43% | 2.49% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2018 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about VCNS and XCNS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VCNS or XCNS?
As of June 12, 2026, VCNS has returned 5.60% year to date, while XCNS has returned 5.68%. XCNS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VCNS or XCNS?
As of June 12, 2026, VCNS manages $908.54 M in assets, while XCNS manages $403.34 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VCNS and XCNS managed?
VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. XCNS is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VCNS and XCNS emphasize?
VCNS is most exposed to Sovereign, Municipal, and Information Technology. XCNS is most exposed to Sovereign, Municipal, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VCNS or XCNS?
Year to date, VCNS has seen +$133.20 M in net flows, compared with +$71.62 M for XCNS. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VCNS and XCNS compare?
VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%, while XCNS has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of VCNS and XCNS?
VCNS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. XCNS's top holdings include NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: VCNS or XCNS?
VCNS holds 24747 securities, while XCNS holds 18437. On holdings count, VCNS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VCNS and XCNS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.