VGG
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF

Full VGG fund page
VS
XMU.U
iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF

Full XMU.U fund page

Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG) and iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMU.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VGG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while XMU.U leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VGG features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.3% for XMU.U. Performance-wise, VGG has returned 14.53% year-to-date with +$62 M in net flows, whereas XMU.U is at 10.56% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 26, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VGG
+2.60%+1.42%+14.53%+12.56%+70.81%
XMU.U
+5.59%+6.28%+10.56%+10.09%+49.14%
Flows
VGG
+$7 M-$15 M+$62 M+$83 M+$640 M
XMU.U
+$2 M+$2 M+$2 M+$2 M-$2 M

VGG vs XMU.U exposure

Countries

VGG
USA
95.30%
XMU.U
USA
93.27%

Sectors

VGG
Technology
26.27%
Finance
20.43%
Healthcare
18.15%
Industrials
9.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Other
16.82%
XMU.U
Technology
30.32%
Finance
14.90%
Healthcare
14.05%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.69%
Other
30.04%
As of October 26, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VGG
Microsoft Corp.
4.67%
Apple, Inc.
4.50%
Broadcom Inc.
4.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.07%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.90%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.84%
Johnson & Johnson
2.73%
Visa, Inc.
2.50%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.03%
Walmart, Inc.
1.96%
XMU.U
Microsoft Corp.
1.57%
Amphenol Corp.
1.52%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.52%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.51%
Welltower, Inc.
1.50%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.45%
Johnson & Johnson
1.45%
Chubb Ltd.
1.45%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.45%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.43%

Diversification

VGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 333 total
33.53%
XMU.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 173 total
14.85%

Characteristics

Compare
VGG
XMU.U
ProviderVanguardiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USDMSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.03%1.05%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 2, 2013October 22, 2019

Frequently asked questions about VGG and XMU.U

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VGG or XMU.U?
As of October 26, 2026, VGG has returned 14.53% year to date, while XMU.U has returned 10.56%. VGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VGG or XMU.U?
As of October 26, 2026, VGG manages $2.63 B in assets, while XMU.U manages $9.75 M. VGG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VGG and XMU.U managed?
VGG is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark. XMU.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VGG and XMU.U emphasize?
VGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XMU.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VGG or XMU.U?
Year to date, VGG has seen +$61.89 M in net flows, compared with +$2.32 M for XMU.U. VGG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VGG and XMU.U compare?
VGG has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while XMU.U has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of VGG and XMU.U?
VGG's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. XMU.U's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Amphenol Corp., and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: VGG or XMU.U?
VGG holds 331 securities, while XMU.U holds 173. On holdings count, VGG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VGG and XMU.U

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds