VS
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VGG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while XUSC.U leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VGG features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.12% for XUSC.U. Performance-wise, VGG has returned 13.81% year-to-date with +$62 M in net flows, whereas XUSC.U is at 12.16% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VGG
XUSC.U
| AuM | $2,614.04 M | $52.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.12% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.31% | 0.13% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VGG | +2.32% | +2.19% | +13.81% | +13.38% | +70.19% |
XUSC.U | -0.94% | +2.16% | +12.16% | +13.83% | - | |
| Flows | VGG | +$10 M | -$16 M | +$62 M | +$80 M | +$642 M |
XUSC.U | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$0 M |
VGG vs XUSC.U exposure
Countries
VGG
USA
95.30%
XUSC.U
USA
96.99%
Sectors
VGG
Technology
26.27%
Finance
20.43%
Healthcare
18.15%
Industrials
9.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Other
16.82%
XUSC.U
Technology
35.25%
Finance
16.50%
Healthcare
11.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.21%
Industrials
9.02%
Other
19.01%
As of October 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VGG
Microsoft Corp.
4.67%
Apple, Inc.
4.50%
Broadcom Inc.
4.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.07%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.90%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.84%
Johnson & Johnson
2.73%
Visa, Inc.
2.50%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.03%
Walmart, Inc.
1.96%
XUSC.U
Microsoft Corp.
3.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.10%
Apple, Inc.
3.09%
Broadcom Inc.
2.83%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Tesla, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.69%
Diversification
VGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 333 total
33.53%
XUSC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
25.39%
Characteristics
Compare
VGG
XUSC.U
| Provider | Vanguard | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.04% | 0.94% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | July 9, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about VGG and XUSC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VGG or XUSC.U?
As of October 23, 2026, VGG has returned 13.81% year to date, while XUSC.U has returned 12.16%. VGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VGG or XUSC.U?
As of October 23, 2026, VGG manages $2.61 B in assets, while XUSC.U manages $52.27 M. VGG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VGG and XUSC.U managed?
VGG is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark. XUSC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VGG and XUSC.U emphasize?
VGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XUSC.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VGG or XUSC.U?
Year to date, VGG has seen +$61.89 M in net flows, compared with +$2.92 M for XUSC.U. VGG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VGG and XUSC.U compare?
VGG has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while XUSC.U has an expense ratio of 0.13%.
What are the top holdings of VGG and XUSC.U?
VGG's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. XUSC.U's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., NVIDIA Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VGG or XUSC.U?
VGG holds 331 securities, while XUSC.U holds 500. On holdings count, XUSC.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VGG and XUSC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.