VGG
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF

Full VGG fund page
VS
ZDY
BMO US Dividend ETF

Full ZDY fund page

Compare Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG) vs BMO US Dividend ETF (ZDY) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VGG provides Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials exposures, while ZDY is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Health Care, and Energy. When evaluating costs, VGG features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.3% for ZDY. Performance-wise, VGG has returned 2.5% year-to-date with +$26 M in net flows, whereas ZDY is at 7.78% with +$62 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 28, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VGG
+5.07%+1.86%+2.50%+19.41%+51.17%
ZDY
+3.84%+5.88%+7.78%+26.15%+54.77%
Flows
VGG
-$0 M+$15 M+$26 M+$81 M+$690 M
ZDY
-$0 M+$54 M+$62 M+$91 M+$105 M

VGG vs ZDY exposure

Countries

VGG
USA
94.11%
ZDY
USA
98.00%

Sectors

VGG
Information Technology
26.28%
Health Care
17.35%
Financials
15.33%
Industrials
11.16%
Consumer Staples
10.42%
Other
19.47%
ZDY
Information Technology
23.55%
Health Care
13.23%
Energy
10.97%
Consumer Staples
10.07%
Financials
8.72%
Communication Services
7.66%
Other
25.81%
As of April 28, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VGG
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.05%
APPLE
4.02%
MICROSOFT-T
3.79%
JPMORGAN CHASE
3.52%
LILLY
3.46%
EXXON
3.37%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.80%
WALMART INC
2.59%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.25%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
2.10%
ZDY
ABBVIE
3.36%
CHEVRON TEXACO
3.12%
PHILLIP MORRIS
3.07%
EXXON
3.00%
APPLE
2.94%
CISCO-T
2.85%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.57%
AT&T
2.54%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
2.39%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
2.21%

Diversification

VGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 334 total
31.94%
ZDY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
28.06%

Characteristics

Compare
VGG
ZDY
ProviderVanguardBMO
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.08%1.58%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 2, 2013March 27, 2013

Frequently asked questions about VGG and ZDY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VGG or ZDY?
As of April 28, 2026, VGG has returned 2.50% year to date, while ZDY has returned 7.78%. ZDY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VGG or ZDY?
As of April 28, 2026, VGG manages $2.33 B in assets, while ZDY manages $803.72 M. VGG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VGG and ZDY managed?
VGG is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark. ZDY is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VGG and ZDY emphasize?
VGG is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials. ZDY is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VGG or ZDY?
Year to date, VGG has seen +$26.40 M in net flows, compared with +$61.59 M for ZDY. ZDY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VGG and ZDY compare?
VGG has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while ZDY has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of VGG and ZDY?
VGG's largest holdings include BROADCOM LIMITED, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. ZDY's top holdings include ABBVIE, CHEVRON TEXACO, and PHILLIP MORRIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: VGG or ZDY?
VGG holds 323 securities, while ZDY holds 97. On holdings count, VGG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VGG and ZDY

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds